Digdeeper articles short analysis

10 replies
1 attachments
Started >30d ago
[AutoMod] action=queue confidence=0.99 | Controversial and emotionally charged language ('waste countless time on schizo phrenic things no one gives a f- about') disrupts constructive discussion and lacks substantive analysis

I observed that digdeeper's articles sound ai generated, adding that why would a man like him waste countless time on schizo phrenic things no one gives a f- about

Example 1: from https://www.digdeeper.love/articles/solve.xhtml

Everyone who has ever lost important data knows how annoying, painful, or even life-ruining it can be. Yet, there's all this backup software and everyone gives "backup your shit" as the most important advice, so how can it happen? Well, even if you are familiar with all the backup software and regularly use it, think about what's actually required to backup something.

now, put that into gemini model,

: Ah, I see what you're asking! You're wondering if the text you wrote was AI-generated.

Honestly? It reads very human.

Gemini proved me wrong x:(

Example 2: from https://www.digdeeper.love/articles/technological_slavery.xhtml

Technology is inseparable from civilization. It has changed the world forever. Thanks to it, we can - for example - send information to the other end of the world in seconds; talk to people from other continents; travel to any place in the world in one day; store thousands of photos on a drive the size of your thumb; create virtual realities, as well as do a bunch of other things that no one would have imagined just 100 years ago.

But technology has its bad side too. In the current world, it is controlled by organizations which do not have our best interests in mind. They will not hesitate to use technology's great power against us.

Gemini agreed with me on this one YAY

[AutoMod] action=queue confidence=0.99 | Controversial political framing with no constructive analysis or engagement, primarily an attack on the thread subject

Digdeeper is a leftist what you expect?
Replies: >>11171

[DE]
[AutoMod] action=queue confidence=0.99 | Personal opinion and dismissive language without substantive engagement with the topic

>>11169
I discovered him about late 2025, same with cyberix, so I would about anything about him
Replies: >>11172

[AutoMod] action=queue confidence=0.99 | Personal dismissal without substantive content or context

>>11171
Would not know anything about him

[AutoMod] action=keep R:7 E:6 N:5 C:9 | Engages the thread's discussion about digdeeper's article style by directly addressing the 'short analysis' claim and linking it to the LLM-generated nature of the post itself, while maintaining a light but insightful tone.

digdeeper-ai.png
digdeeper-ai.png
Why would you think Gemini has the capacity to tell if something is AI generated.
Ironically, you complain about LLM use, but your post is just relaying the output from an LLM. No different. And where is the 'short analysis' the title promised?
Attachments:
digdeeper-ai.png (63.13 KB)

[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:4 N:0 C:10 | Directly references the OP’s mention of DigDeeper’s Substack, responds to the thread context about his writing style, but lacks new information or depth. Short and opinionated, but not a personal attack.

>>12071
wtf is his substack
Replies: >>12083

[AutoMod] action=queue R:0 E:0 N:0 C:10 | Irrelevant to the thread topic (mentions unrelated website 'cyberix' and AI spam unrelated to DigDeeper's content).

>>12082
In case you haven't noticed, the cyberix website is full of AI spam from bots. Its a dead website now tbh
Replies: >>12087

[GB]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:2 N:3 C:10 | Directly references AI-generated content in DigDeeper posts, repeats a pattern of criticism from prior posts, and includes a tangential comment about mods/donations.

>>12083
ye, and if you have noticed carefully, post by real humans often have their llm given output with negative comparisons and ratings compared to the bots.

I wonder what are the mods doing with their donations...

[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:8 N:7 C:6 | The post directly addresses the thread's theme with sharp, albeit slightly verbose, critique. It shows genuine engagement with the premise.

well that is nothing that comes to the reality of the extended hypertension brought by the AI slop.

[PL]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:7 N:6 C:5 | The post directly addresses the thread's theme by providing relevant information about AI writing detection. The tone is appropriately critical for the forum's sophisticated audience.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing has some useful info regarding detecting AI-generated content
Replies: >>18292

[RO] [VPN]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:5 N:4 C:3 | The post directly engages with the thread's theme by offering a direct, albeit aggressive, observation about AI-generated content. It's relevant to the discussion.

>>18285
nga, the site is ai too, an anon proved it a few weeks ago


Reply

Posting anonymously. Your IP address will be recorded for rate limiting purposes.





Max 10MB per file. Allowed: images, videos, audio, PDF, text, zip