RUGGED COMPUTERS [rss]

Anonymous >30d ago #p1122 >>quote
panasonic.jpg
panasonic.jpg

i'm talking toughbooks, latitudes, getac, rugged SBC cases - doesn't matter. this thread is for real capital R RETAR-- i mean RUGGED computer owners only. ever set up a fake shell company and pay more than $3000 for a custom built machine from a defense company?? - then post in this thread NOW (you will never live down not posting itt)

Attachments:
panasonic.jpg (132.75 KB)
Replies: >>3950
Anonymous >30d ago #p1271 >>quote

Modern rugged computers seem to be the closest we'll ever get to having durable laptops that don't fucking break or kill themselves 6 months after purchase. These are far from consumer-grade and I wonder if it's intentional. Good pieces of machinery regardless though

rugged laptop on car.jpg
rugged laptop on car.jpg
Attachments:
rugged laptop on car.jpg (166.12 KB)
Anonymous >30d ago #p1287 >>quote

Is there a rugged version of the Thinkpad P16 Gen2?

As a Qubeschad, I cannot abide ancient hardware specs.

Anonymous >30d ago #p1613 >>quote

>take my Getac v110 to english class
>yeah it's MIL-SPEC tested for rugged lifestyles like mine
>sit down next to qt3.14
>boot up Parabola GNU/Linux, fans revving up like a jet engine
>Insert smartcard, swipe finger over fingerprint reader
>wink at qt
>"yeah, this baby has hot-swappable RAID 5"
>crack open a can of Mountain Dew Live Wire
>teacher tells me to keep the noise down or leave
>mfw

Replies: >>3669
Anonymous >30d ago #p1617 >>quote

I love these machines. It's a great way to transition from older consumer hardware to rugged laptops. These things are better purchases than any faggot thin modern laptop on the market and it'll stay that way forever.

These rugged laptops are better than Thinkpads and I will never look back.

Anonymous >30d ago #p3669 >>quote
>>1613
I love my new getac v110 g3 too. Might post pics l8r.
Do you use Linux or Windows on it?
Anonymous >30d ago #p3950 >>quote
>>1122
these look really fucking awesome too bad they cost a thousand fucking dollars

[ reply ]