[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:7 N:6 C:8 | The post offers a coherent, albeit slightly verbose, extension of the theme of distrust. It connects the idea of trusting employees to personal safety and legal assurances effectively.
>>18568
i think a good point along those lines would be to not trust the employees of a seemingly reputable company, judged so by Google search, an LLM, or a travel agency using the formers, to ensure your personal safety, because the employees and the company are protected, to some degree, behind liability waivers, insurance contracts, and other legal assurances
while it may seem alarmist to declare or imply that your fellow man can no longer be trusted to dutifully fulfill his tasks as ordained by his middle manager, modern people live so passively in this frictionless world that they blindly assume, without challenge, that everything will proceed as advertised, including the employees charged with tossing you over a cliff, as they have done a thousand times before
do not assume the "well oiled machine" will continue to work just because the sticker touts its ninety-eight-and-three-quarters percent guarantee.
all the systems which alleviate personal accountability, from the thrill seeker to the gaggle of browns committing manslaughter, and even you, have one goal: to ensure their continued existence, by any means necessary. whether its manipulating people by abusing cutting-edge behavioral psychology to make them more impulsive and less informed; breaking employees' autonomy by making them perform the same, simple tasks thousands of times to the point where throwing someone off of a cliff isn't novel enough for the rope-placer, whose only job may be to place the rope on the ground in front of the person-throwers, to care about the rope being unattached before it's too late; the news agencies and journalists bringing you this highly informative story of human tragedy so you won't find yourself in all these ridiculous, unlikely scenarios and dare repeat history twice; even the "thrill experience" industry, for lack of a better term, having another death and widespread news story under their belt as they assure their new customers how safe they are compared to this tragedy. all these systems perform cruel and inhumane acts, by no individual choice or realization, to further their position in whatever domain they occupy
it would be even funnier if these brazillians were just some guys off the street she paid 25 bucks to chuck her over the edge, but i'm not reading the news story to find out. in trying to find the video, however, what i found most repulsive was the only pictures of the woman being slutty onlyfans-style photos. i don't know which is worse, a woman having no decent photos of herself on her social media profile, or the news agencies choosing suggestive photos of a dead woman to keep readers' attention