now i made some software
but now i'm thinking..
how i will open this can of tomato sauce to the public without cucking myself, but without cucking the average dev?
gplv3 is fun and all but i think its fucking retarded when it comes to maintaining credit and ownership over your shit
I am not going to do something and then have a corporation lie and take my shit and not give me proper credit and then make brilliongrazillions off of it
no motherfucker fuck you le freedumbz
I will make it open source but i dunno what license
gpl and bsd and mit are cuck licenses
dont forget about microcock using gpl code and windows xp sauce leak reveals tons of gpl code that went un-sourced
WOOOW
maybe my license would be
>i am not responsible if you FUCK UP because of this program
>the sauce is FREE and you may FORK it
>but I am allowed to take back whatever you do to your FORK
>and you WILL license your fork and anything new you add to that fork and anything that **RELIES** or is **RELATED** to that fork or my original code under the SAME LICENSE that MY code is licensed under
>use a little bit of MY code
>now have to open source YOUR ENTIRE FUCKING PROJECT
+
thse 4chan posts:
"the GPL is ironically the reason why linux and the free software ecosystem suffers from corporate capture, as it forces large entities that might have ulterior motives such as pushing for the use of certain services and frameworks to add their contributions to projects, which also encourages administrative bloat (CoC stuff, etc.) as those large entities demand a more regulated foss ecosystem. corpos can take advantage of BSD/MIT-licensed projects all they want, yes, but they tend to do their own thing with them instead of polluting the main branch with their changes. "
AND ESPECIALLY:
"What I am complaining about is that Microsoft and Google have been able to legally circumvent the intent of licenses like GPL and LGPL by implementing features like WSL. Small companies simply do not have the resources to create a hypervisor using (for example) ReactOS, implement a new BSD or closed source NTFS library, or some similar kike loophole for shipping a new device with the same feature set. Like commies always do, you are approaching this from the perspective of someone else's money. Your main objection is that someone else makes money. My objection is that Microsoft enjoys far too much control over the computing world because of project that think they're doing us a favor by writing in GPL. It is a cancer which has strangled out smaller companies that don't have the same resources. And as I've extensively outlined, GPL solved *none* of the problems that it purports to. Freeloading is still a problem for both BSD and GPL. Corporate infiltration is still a problem for GPL (WSL and Playstore are 2 examples). GPL also did not prevent companies from locking you out of their code."
so to all of those licenses, I shall say:
FUCK THAT SHIT!!!
IT'S MY CODE, MOTHERFUCKER
RESPECT ME AND HAIL ME AND GIVE CREDIT TO ME AND CYBERIX
IF YOU EVER SO MUCH AS MONETIZE MY SHIT,
YOU BETTER GIVE ME A PERCENTAGE OF THE PROFITS!
IF YOU MAKE A THOUSAND DOLLARS
GIVE ME 10 BUX
IF YOU MAKE A MILLION
GIVE ME A THOUSAND BUX OR SOMETHING
IF YOU MAKE A BILLION
GIVE ME 100K OR SOMETHING
A TRILLION?
MOTHERFUCKER HAND ME 500K OR A MILLION!!!!!!!!
RAAAAAAAAAAH
lets expand upon this and make a license that isn't cucked
but now i'm thinking..
how i will open this can of tomato sauce to the public without cucking myself, but without cucking the average dev?
gplv3 is fun and all but i think its fucking retarded when it comes to maintaining credit and ownership over your shit
I am not going to do something and then have a corporation lie and take my shit and not give me proper credit and then make brilliongrazillions off of it
no motherfucker fuck you le freedumbz
I will make it open source but i dunno what license
gpl and bsd and mit are cuck licenses
dont forget about microcock using gpl code and windows xp sauce leak reveals tons of gpl code that went un-sourced
WOOOW
maybe my license would be
>i am not responsible if you FUCK UP because of this program
>the sauce is FREE and you may FORK it
>but I am allowed to take back whatever you do to your FORK
>and you WILL license your fork and anything new you add to that fork and anything that **RELIES** or is **RELATED** to that fork or my original code under the SAME LICENSE that MY code is licensed under
>use a little bit of MY code
>now have to open source YOUR ENTIRE FUCKING PROJECT
+
thse 4chan posts:
"the GPL is ironically the reason why linux and the free software ecosystem suffers from corporate capture, as it forces large entities that might have ulterior motives such as pushing for the use of certain services and frameworks to add their contributions to projects, which also encourages administrative bloat (CoC stuff, etc.) as those large entities demand a more regulated foss ecosystem. corpos can take advantage of BSD/MIT-licensed projects all they want, yes, but they tend to do their own thing with them instead of polluting the main branch with their changes. "
AND ESPECIALLY:
"What I am complaining about is that Microsoft and Google have been able to legally circumvent the intent of licenses like GPL and LGPL by implementing features like WSL. Small companies simply do not have the resources to create a hypervisor using (for example) ReactOS, implement a new BSD or closed source NTFS library, or some similar kike loophole for shipping a new device with the same feature set. Like commies always do, you are approaching this from the perspective of someone else's money. Your main objection is that someone else makes money. My objection is that Microsoft enjoys far too much control over the computing world because of project that think they're doing us a favor by writing in GPL. It is a cancer which has strangled out smaller companies that don't have the same resources. And as I've extensively outlined, GPL solved *none* of the problems that it purports to. Freeloading is still a problem for both BSD and GPL. Corporate infiltration is still a problem for GPL (WSL and Playstore are 2 examples). GPL also did not prevent companies from locking you out of their code."
so to all of those licenses, I shall say:
FUCK THAT SHIT!!!
IT'S MY CODE, MOTHERFUCKER
RESPECT ME AND HAIL ME AND GIVE CREDIT TO ME AND CYBERIX
IF YOU EVER SO MUCH AS MONETIZE MY SHIT,
YOU BETTER GIVE ME A PERCENTAGE OF THE PROFITS!
IF YOU MAKE A THOUSAND DOLLARS
GIVE ME 10 BUX
IF YOU MAKE A MILLION
GIVE ME A THOUSAND BUX OR SOMETHING
IF YOU MAKE A BILLION
GIVE ME 100K OR SOMETHING
A TRILLION?
MOTHERFUCKER HAND ME 500K OR A MILLION!!!!!!!!
RAAAAAAAAAAH
lets expand upon this and make a license that isn't cucked