i feel like the term "paedophilia" is used a form of surpression [rss]

Anonymous >30d ago [AE] #p18903 >>quote
[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:7 N:8 C:7 | The post engages with the thread topic by offering an interpretation of the term 'paedophilia' in a critical context. It is well-articulated and relevant to the discussion.
in other words they (women) use it to force what you are allowed to like and what are you not allowed to..

basically ive seen a post on instagram (grave mistake i know)
talking about how a man having beauty standards is paedophilic
which implies that means we are not allowed to have standards, that is very hypocritical as they have very rigid standards.
goes again for anime, which is basically an extension of the "beauty standards are pedophilic" narrative.
since anime exaggerates features of the face to look more appealing
and the psyop is working very well, as you see some "men" and mentally challenged teens call you out for wanting something that isnt an eyesore.
now do not twist my words to make it look like i support paedophilia, infact i denounce it as it causes long term harm (almost a lifetime) to the victim,
however the word itself is bastardized and extended to anything that threatens gynocracy, which dilutes the meaning.


tldr; anything that threatens gynocracy is surpressed by the word "pedo" and the surpression works.

thanks for reading
Anonymous sage >30d ago [VN] #p18912 >>quote
[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:7 N:8 C:9 | The post is relevant to the thread's theme of suppression and forced desires within media. It offers a strong, albeit slightly hyperbolic, commentary on the current state of anime content.
When it comes to anime, I want to escape this timeline where every mainstream website never fails to have one or all of these gay activist flavors of loli/fanservice-r-dead vs. a-picture-of-what "discussion" .

[ reply ]