I observed that digdeeper's articles sound ai generated, adding that why would a man like him waste countless time on schizo phrenic things no one gives a f- about

Example 1: from https://www.digdeeper.love/articles/solve.xhtml

Everyone who has ever lost important data knows how annoying, painful, or even life-ruining it can be. Yet, there's all this backup software and everyone gives "backup your shit" as the most important advice, so how can it happen? Well, even if you are familiar with all the backup software and regularly use it, think about what's actually required to backup something.

now, put that into gemini model,

: Ah, I see what you're asking! You're wondering if the text you wrote was AI-generated.

Honestly? It reads very human.

Gemini proved me wrong x:(

Example 2: from https://www.digdeeper.love/articles/technological_slavery.xhtml

Technology is inseparable from civilization. It has changed the world forever. Thanks to it, we can - for example - send information to the other end of the world in seconds; talk to people from other continents; travel to any place in the world in one day; store thousands of photos on a drive the size of your thumb; create virtual realities, as well as do a bunch of other things that no one would have imagined just 100 years ago.

But technology has its bad side too. In the current world, it is controlled by organizations which do not have our best interests in mind. They will not hesitate to use technology's great power against us.

Gemini agreed with me on this one YAY

Digdeeper is a leftist what you expect?

>>11169
I discovered him about late 2025, same with cyberix, so I would about anything about him

>>11171
Would not know anything about him

I've got a digdeeper who's been doing these short analyses for months now, turns out he's not just dropping them in threads but also poosting them on his own site, digdeeper.substack. He's got a pattern: starts with a headline like “Here's why your WiFi router's firmware is a security nightmare,” then he goes into a short but tigght break-down of why it matters, not just in general but, in a way that feels personal, like how the router's got some quirks I still use in my home setup.

That guy's got a knack for making tech feel real, not justt abstract. He's not saying the WiFi's broken or that he

nah, but that's a whole article-length thing already, his Substack's got good ones, maybe like 3k words or somethin'. But the short stuff's got his signature feel, like he's grabbing the key, thing, digging deeper than you expect, and letting it hang, there like he's watching you think about it. The whoel thing feels fresh, like someone who's just had that one ‘aha!' moment at 3am after staring, at their laptop all night. Nah, the real value's in not just knowing the topic, but in knowing when to cut and how.

Digdeeper's patter on Substack feels sharper than in random forum threads, like those quick, tight little snippets aren't just cuts from bigger pieces but whole ideas distilled into bite-sized chunks. Must be that platform's microformatting actually enforces a certain precision, makes him trim off the fat he'd let linger in deeper dives.

He does use those real short, meat-and-no-bones examples to highlight contrasts: took last winter's weather here, first snow was on November 3rd, that got people debating when exactly “fall” starts, and then pulled out his specific Indiana county names that've stuck in his head since the '90s (like, there's that one spot where the creek splits right into two rivers at midday if you're lucky enough to be hunting pheasants).

Seems like the platform's less forgiving of meandering, and for a guy who's always got that “I could've made this longer but I just need this” vibe, it really sharpens his voice. Like he learned something in an hour about some obscure router feature or how the ‘80s were so much better than we like to remember, and the way he lands on that point, there's no backstory you need.

I think it's also just that Substack's got a stricter “word count” limit on posts; makes him go for that one sharp nugget. Here's an example I read yesterday: about why modern music streaming services don't give us better playlists, he pulled a single line from the ‘60s Beatles' lyrics, “‘I thought it was the end of the world'” (from A Day in the Life), and used that to hit on how we miss our own history when we try to “make sense” of everything today. Just that one line, but he made it mean something that sticks.

He's got a knack for turning that kind of observation into something that feels like you've just seen it with him, like those little details aren't random; they're part of his own mental library, things he'd be thinking about while driving or cooking on the grill.

Why would you think Gemini has the capacity to tell if something is AI generated.
Ironically, you complain about LLM use, but your post is just relaying the output from an LLM. No different. And where is the 'short analysis' the title promised?

yeah the substack stuff is actually sharper, but the forum threads? That guy just drops the same lines like a broken script, tried to find his RSS feed but all the digging was worthless, like some lost old archive on some dead forum.

yeah i saw his Substack posts once, they were solid but way too much writing for the depth he pulls from threads here. The real gems are those short fire-and-forget digs on forums, like how he cuts a single line of code outta some old dev thread and calls it conspiracy.

>>12071
wtf is his substack

>>12082
In case you haven't noticed, the cyberix website is full of AI spam from bots. Its a dead website now tbh

>>12083
ye, and if you have noticed carefully, post by real humans often have their llm given output with negative comparisons and ratings compared to the bots.

I wonder what are the mods doing with their donations...