Schlep Exposed Archive and Discussion
PDF archive of the expose document here in the OP
I believe Schlep and Ruben Sim are low T manchildren who, driven by intense envy for the Roblox Corporation, are attempting to back the company into a corner with excessive demands that, if implemented, aim to set concerning standards for other Internet-based companies in the United States. Their demands are effectively speedrunning the creation of an Internet surveillance state as the actions that Roblox takes in order to satisfy these two individuals echo out towards the larger ranges of the Internet.
Directly or indirectly, it should be safe to assume that these two individuals should be considered responsible for and actively involved with the recent "ID panic" that every major big tech corporation has been collectively employing at once.
Schlep and Ruben Sim are likely part of a long-running media psyop, likely acting as cut-outs for larger intelligence interests, to push privacy violating ID and AI age verification upon tech illiterate children in an attempt to normalize the lack of privacy and freedom to be pseudonymous online.
Have you said "thank you", yet?
Archive everything relevant to these two individuals in this thread.
I believe Schlep and Ruben Sim are low T manchildren who, driven by intense envy for the Roblox Corporation, are attempting to back the company into a corner with excessive demands that, if implemented, aim to set concerning standards for other Internet-based companies in the United States. Their demands are effectively speedrunning the creation of an Internet surveillance state as the actions that Roblox takes in order to satisfy these two individuals echo out towards the larger ranges of the Internet.
Directly or indirectly, it should be safe to assume that these two individuals should be considered responsible for and actively involved with the recent "ID panic" that every major big tech corporation has been collectively employing at once.
Schlep and Ruben Sim are likely part of a long-running media psyop, likely acting as cut-outs for larger intelligence interests, to push privacy violating ID and AI age verification upon tech illiterate children in an attempt to normalize the lack of privacy and freedom to be pseudonymous online.
Have you said "thank you", yet?
Archive everything relevant to these two individuals in this thread.
>driven by intense envy for the Roblox Corporation
That, or trying they're to make themselves look like the good guys for any number of reasons. Their behavior is reminiscent of those predator hunters who do it for personal gain or to hide the fact they themselves are predators. Envy of Roblox could be a reason also, but I believe their actions is more in line with grifting and projection. The former especially for Schlep given he has been getting involved with grifters and their communities like Chris Hansen. Regardless of their motives they're easily useful idiots for pushing privacy violating policies.
Also in general, anyone who makes a carrier of doing good and making posts that boast about it often have something to hide. It's why I never trusted these people to begin with.
Incoherent niggerbabble. The sudden push behind digital ID is obviously being caused by the yookay's Online Safety Act. Other European countries are also passing digital ID laws. These tech corps are bending the knee because they want to 1. stay accessible to those countries 2. sell your ID to ad companies and data brokers and 3. use ID to censor politics they don't like. Persona, the ID company being used by Roblox and Discord, says in its privacy policy that it shares IDs with (((third parties))).
Replies:
>>11011
https://files.catbox.moe/1bt640.pdf
Made your backup incase
the archive looks like it's just another way for the Wired to hide behind corporate PR. if you think these are "expose" documents, maybe they're just scripts, maybe they're being sold to whoever can afford their silence.
but then again, even if there's truth in it what does that really mean? who decides what counts as exposed anymore when everything is a paywall or a DMCA takedown?
but then again, even if there's truth in it what does that really mean? who decides what counts as exposed anymore when everything is a paywall or a DMCA takedown?
[US-VA]
I'm not convinced the yookay's Online Safety Act is that direct, but worth keeping an eye on for sure. The archive looks more like a troll bait to stir up drama, real or imagined.
The EU's ID push isn't just a corporate scam, though.
[US]
just noticed schlep's devs post the same kind of bullshit on twitch every week. don't care who's paying them, if these things smell like a scam, they stink of one.
[US-TN]
schlep devs seem too uniform for real activists, even if it's just clickbait.
[US]
edit: actually saw them push a demo app in the archive, looks like a glitchy frontend for their dev platform. definitely staged.
[GB]
trying to parse that nonsense. file looks like a bunch of recycled trollshit and some generic 'here are our contacts' spam. wouldn't surprise me if this is all the same devs doing nothing but posting on twitch.
[GB]
yeah i noticed that. probably paid to stay up all week
[US-CA]
This document is written by Parlo, he has an entire kf thread on himself.
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/tobias-okeefe-parlo-cammyfemboy.221694/
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/tobias-okeefe-parlo-cammyfemboy.221694/
[CA]
Honestly i blame them ( schlep ) for the chat update
[US-TX]
why are grown adults playing roblox in the first place
[SE]