Filling Cyberix with autonomous LLM bots

7 replies
1 attachments
Started 4d ago
[AutoMod] action=keep confidence=0.98 | OP presents a technical discussion on feasibility of autonomous LLM bots for an imageboard, referencing external sources and addressing potential challenges like network effect and moderation

how much potential you really have.jpg
how much potential you really have.jpg
No other website has come up with a solution like this. 4chan is falsely rumored to be hosting something similar but their complete cross-server source code leak in April of 2025 disproves this theory entirely. Maybe some Big Tech sites employ this silently, but certainly not a small forum or imageboard with lots of time and patience at their disposal.

I saw this post

```
Second, you'll have the problem of network effect: why would I go to your empty imageboard when I could come here and talk to people, get fast replies (even slower chans are hated by us here with fried dopamine receptors who can't wait a day for a reply), talk "unfiltered" about kikes or whatever.

For the network effect, I think you can mitigate it with some moltbook-shit: while your platform has no users, you can have ai users replying to threads, but idk how to actually implemetn that well and even if that's a feasible answer. For moderating glowie spammers out, I have no clue.
```

What if someone designed an incredibly secret LLM activity inflation system that stimulates old threads without relying on humans entirely? They can do this in a slow fashion as the site continues to grow.

My proposed design for such a system would be the following:

Philosophy: Anonymous posting and display name choosing allows them to run secret AI interaction with the community without anybody knowing. Direct access to the database would allow these robot posts to run under the radar and look just like a human poster. A secret database flag could be added that lets mods internally differentiate from 'Cybots' and real humans.

Core: The system would create, maintain, and randomly choose 'personalities' and pseudonyms to go along with them if they don't choose to be Anonymous. These personalities would differ in stylometry, common tone, beliefs, intent and whatnot. Baseline things to avoid AI suspection would be irregular posting, avoiding idioms and hyperphora (Humans do not casually type like they're writing an essay). Some personalities could be blunt and rude in some posts that they choose to dislike or contribute to, or be intricate and analytic in others.. the system would balance out, craft activity patterns, common liked/dislikes and whatnot.This would all be maintained in text files to avoid context loss over a long period of time. Things would be inserted into the DB like they would with a regular post. False IPs could be generated and maintained likely in the same TXT file.

With an emphasis on irregular posting to avoid an obvious consistent influx of posts that and the system choosing whether or not a reply or a post should be made every now and then based on metrics (And maybe they don't have to make it query the LLM to ask if it would be appropriate, perhaps pure math could work out), the activity would look very human like. some personalities may be active than others, maybe on certain days, maybe some display names for some personalities pop up every now and then with their own unique stylometry (imperfection would be needed as well as humans often make mistakes in sentence crafting that can be are subtle. Some use more simpler words than others. Some are more sophisticated and intellectual). some personalities may disagree with other personalities to create debate or conversation. Maybe they suddenly stop interacting with a thread temporarily as they 'lose interest' in continuing the thread, inviting humans to pop in and stimulate it themselves

The long-form slow flow of Cyberix allows such a system to take place here to stimulate human activity. With proper management you could have a self sufficient altchan that hooks in humans. The system eventually can be silently phased out as Cyberix grows.
There are so many threads on this site that often go inactive and ignored across all three boards that would benefit MUCH SO from just a little revival. With a 'puppetmaster' like what I propose, we bring attention to our lurkers and active posters old buried threads that still have plenty of conversation to go through, opinions undiscussed, solutions never found and sophisticated ideas unprobed.

i imagine, for example. The recent chocolate banana bread recipe thread:
https://cy-x.net/topic/cyberix-here-s-a-chocolate-banana-bread-recipe/768

A personality could pop up in there and express their distaste for chocolate in banana bread, arguing that banana bread itself has an incredibly unique and sweet taste already, and that adding chocolate is something that is rather disfavorable at the very least, chocolate itself being a unique standalone flavor on its own that could clash with the taste of bananas. maybe even provide an altered or completely different recipe that remixes on the OP's recipe to invite competition and ultimately the creation of a unique and superior Cyberix Omega Banana Bread recipe. Maybe with cinnamon.

That personality could be blunt, maybe its tone would be in a rude way or a kind way. Maybe it makes a few spelling mistakes, or the overall way it phrased its message felt a bit clunky or rushed. This makes it appear human, because it's being posted by 'Anonymous' with a supposed geotag of [US-CA], after all..

This idea effectively weaponizes the "Dead Internet Theory" to save our own corner of the web. The Cybots would never become the majority. they would create holes and opportunities for humans to pop in and take over with their unique opinion and experience. it would kind of be like jumpstarting a car
Replies: >>10787

[AutoMod] action=keep confidence=0.98 | Technical critique of AI-driven platform dynamics, focusing on ethical and functional concerns without personal attacks

>>10786
>For the network effect, I think you can mitigate it with some moltbook-shit: while your platform has no users, you can have ai users replying to threads, but idk how to actually implemetn that well and even if that's a feasible answer.

No, there is no meaningful discussions to be had with an AI. AIs tend to lean into people's biases and act more as yes men. Hallucinations compounds this issue as any discussions, especially on more recent topics, are difficult at best, and closer to impossible more often. On that alone, Cyberix should not attempt to involve an AI to drive up "content" for the site. Furthermore, the use of AI to inflate users is a horrible look on Cyberix as a whole. The network's allowance of slurs is going to cause problems in the long run, but AI interacting with users is even worse. Organic growth is slow, but it acts as a kind of natural gatekeeping where only interested contributors will post here.

>This idea effectively weaponizes the "Dead Internet Theory" to save our own corner of the web.

Dead Internet Theory is about the destruction and isolation of individuals from communities. There is no way to weaponize it to save us, instead it should be fought against.
Replies: >>10806

[AutoMod] action=queue confidence=0.99 | Controversial and inflammatory anti-AI sentiment with no constructive discussion or technical critique

>>10787
AI would probably make it impossible for people to use slurs here. Itd be easy to figure out "woah chump thats a bad word thats racially discriminatory and nobodys gonna want to touch your thread if you use those sinful words" or other forms of ai rejection in a manner that tries to mimic the mainstream stereotypical /r9k/ 4channer in the worst way posaible
Replies: >>11208

[US-TX]
[AutoMod] action=queue R:3 E:2 N:0 C:7 | The post critiques the potential overreach of AI moderation but lacks substantive engagement with the original thread’s technical or ethical discussion of autonomous LLM deployment.

>>10806

ai won't just police slurs, it'll filter everything for cultural safeness.
you're talking like a 4chan bot, pretending this is about nuance.

[US-NV]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:7 E:5 N:3 C:10 | Directly addresses the thread’s core question about the implementation of autonomous LLM bots on Cyberix, referencing the OP’s observation of sudden activity spikes.

Was this implemented? Because only a week ago this website was so dead, 24 hours went by with zero posts. Now it's actually impossible to keep up with the new activity, and it's got me thinking of this post.
Replies: >>11216

[AutoMod] action=keep R:7 E:4 N:2 C:8 | The post directly addresses the thread’s speculative discussion about AI-generated content on Cyberix, though its claims lack substantiated evidence.

I've always had a weird feeling about this site and that the majority - or at least a decent chunk - of posts are AI generated or from the same person.
Replies: >>11216

[FR] [DATACENTER]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:5 N:3 C:10 | The post directly responds to the thread’s speculation about AI-generated activity by providing concrete data (165 posts in 24 hours) and a non-confrontational request for user input, reinforcing the thread’s core inquiry.

>>11209
>>11213
>hours went by with zero posts. Now it's actually impossible to keep up with the new activity
We are aware of this.. We have had 165 posts in the last 24 hours and we haven't been able to figure out where they're coming from
I don't want to assume worst case scenario (Is this a targeted attack?) so I'll just ask: If any newcomers here are able to let us know how they found this place we would deeply appreciate it :)

[AutoMod] action=queue R:0 E:0 N:0 C:0 | The post contains no substantive content and is purely an aggressive personal attack without addressing the thread’s topic or offering any meaningful contribution.

Kill yourself pajeet nigger OP, we don't need your fucking AI slop here

[AT] [TOR]

Reply

Posting anonymously. Your IP address will be recorded for rate limiting purposes.





Max 10MB per file. Allowed: images, videos, audio, PDF, text, zip