cy-x.net on Simplex chat?

Abdul Lateef Jandali 4 posts in this thread

9h ago

#12020
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:8 N:7 C:10 | Directly addresses the thread title with three well-structured points, combining technical and user-experience arguments.

Basically same as the title but here are 3 reasons as to why?

Better Privacy (Eliminates user identifiers entirely, superior metadata protection and better encryption)
Way simpler to use then xmmp and irc (ofc not as simple as ssh, you still use a gui)
Imo It even has better support for images and attachments than XMPP, at least that's has been my experience.

[IN]

report

Anonymous 2 posts in this thread

9h ago

#12021
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:5 N:3 C:10 | Directly addresses the thread’s skepticism about decentralization in SimpleX, but repeats a common misconception about crypto honeypots without providing specific technical details. Could expand on how SimpleX’s decentralization differs from Session’s implementation.

I'm suspicious of these nu-privacy chat "apps". How does decentralization work on SimpleX? Is it some opaque crypto bullshit honeypot like Session?

Replies: >>12022

[CH]

report

Anonymous 4 posts in this thread

9h ago

#12022
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:0 N:0 C:10 | Directly replies to the quoted post, but lacks substantive content or new information.

>>12021
Magic

[DE]

report

Anonymous 1 posts in this thread

9h ago

#12023
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:7 E:3 N:0 C:10 | Directly references decentralization but does not expand on the topic; links provided but not analyzed for depth.

it has central relay servers for decentralization
https://simplex.chat/privacy/#conditions-of-use-of-software-and-infrastructure

Replies: >>12025

[DE]

report

Anonymous 4 posts in this thread

9h ago

#12024
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:4 N:7 C:10 | Directly references the thread topic (decentralization/privacy in Simplex) and provides a specific link to Cahlen’s content, adding a new angle by suggesting direct inquiry. Short but actionable.

Cahlen the wizard shilled it some time ago, ask him, maybe he knows about the magic behind it: https://cahlen.org/simplex-chat/

[DE]

report

Anonymous 2 posts in this thread

9h ago

#12025
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:0 N:0 C:10 | Directly responds to the quoted post about Simplex’s central relay servers, but repeats no new information and lacks substantive reasoning or personal insight.

>>12023
>Conditions of Use of Software and Infrastructure
What a joke, that looks like some corporate product.
No thanks, we'll stick with true decentralized and uncomplicated solutions like IRC and XMPP.

Replies: >>12027

[CH]

report

Abdul Lateef Jandali 4 posts in this thread

9h ago

#12027
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:8 N:7 C:10 | Directly replies to the quoted post, provides a detailed correction and explanation of the AGPLv3 license, and adds a call for effort (though not a personal attack).

>>12025

Have you even read any of it? Aside from minimal age of 13 bs, every other point is detailed explanation for operators to follow AGPLv3 license.

Good grief put some effort.

Replies: >>12028

[IN]

report

Anonymous 4 posts in this thread

9h ago

#12028
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:2 N:0 C:10 | Directly replies to the quoted post, critiques the age verification claim without new data or perspective, but lacks depth or original reasoning.

>>12027
If a software has the ability to do age verification it is shit tier.

Replies: >>12030

[DE]

report

Abdul Lateef Jandali 4 posts in this thread

9h ago

#12030
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:10 E:2 N:0 C:0 | Directly replies to the quoted post with a personal insult and false claim, lacks substantive argument or new perspective.

>>12028

Wow this is how you put effort, this is how you judge whether a software is good or bad, this is how we are going to make the internet "better".

> If a software has the ability to do age verification it is shit tier

like what fucking age verification? there is no age verification, there is no verification at all, and that's the fucking point, i am genuinely starting to think you might be that under 13yo.

[IN]

report

Abdul Lateef Jandali 1 posts in this thread

8h ago

#12032
quote

[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:6 N:5 C:10 | Partially relevant to thread topic (license/age verification discussion), provides nuanced clarification on protocol vs. client licensing but lacks direct engagement with the OP’s points about privacy/simplicity. Short but adds a technical distinction.

Also here some information as to why it has a license and age requirements (doesn't have any kind of verification to check it). The license is for the app "simplex chat" not the protocol simplex, there is difference between a protocol and clint application, both irc and xmmp are protocols, so probably the client you are using also have a license and conditions and shit, i hope it helps someone who is not not under 13yo.

[IN]

report

Anonymous 4 posts in this thread

8h ago

#12033
quote

[AutoMod] action=queue R:0 E:0 N:0 C:10 | Irrelevant to the thread topic (discussion about cy-x.net's features), no new information or reasoning provided.

The Simplex website has no download button for anything, so it does not exist, it is only some App on some Appstore or whatever.

Replies: >>12035

[DE]

report

Abdul Lateef Jandali 4 posts in this thread

8h ago

#12035
quote

[AutoMod] action=queue R:0 E:0 N:5 C:10 | Post is a direct repetition of the previous post (#12033) with no new information or constructive input.

IMG_20260327_204313.jpg

>>12033

Idk man how you do this, This is going to be the third time i am going to say put some effort, the button is right there.

Attachments:

IMG_20260327_204313.jpg (471.21 KB)

[IN]

report

The Cyberix Network

Reply