HOW DO WE PROTECT OURSELVES FROM THE ONGOING INVASION OF THE INTERNET BEING PERPETRATED BY THIRD WORLD SHITHOLES AND TECH ILLITERATES?

14 replies
2 attachments
Started >30d ago

internet_country.jpg
internet_country.jpg

Is the internet going to survive the next 20 years?

The internet as I knew it died in 2007, but I still have the right to use HTTP to find sites like these.

>Dead internet theory
>Dothead internet theory (everyone you talk to is an Indian larping as other races and nationalities of humans)
>The very core companies that power the internet taken over by Indian Hindu invaders and destroyed
>The enshittification of web standards and technology
>Constant, unending jewish assaults on privacy and freedom so they can track and monitor everyone who is against them murdering babies
>Zoomers lacking skills and critical thinking

Is there any scenario in which the internet as we know it is going to survive the next 20 years?

I genuinely think at this point, if we can't cut India and Israel off from the internet, we will need a global internet id so we always know who is posting what on the internet and that it's actually a human. Anonymous posting will have to be sacrificed. That is where this is all going.

After pretty much every "white" trad west account on twitter was exposed as being an Indian Hindu invader, and /pol/ being exposed as a giant Indian cesspool, I'm ready. Having jews track all of our posts will be a small price to pay if at least we know when we are talking to fellow humans or not. In the end I think countries are going to recognize that China and Iran were right all along to disconnect themselves from the global internet and put a firewall in between them and 2 billion Indians and other bad actors being able to take over and subvert their websites.

Each country having their own physically connected internet. is a much easier solution. People of different cultures can never mix it always leads to trouble both online and IRL. Segregation is a must, all people are not equal in the sense of beliefs and ways of life and this creates conflict, this isn't about race. All humans should have the same rights, they just should mix with people on the other side of the fucking world. It will come to a point where you can no longer distinguish what is real or fake behind a screen thanks to AI slop so eventually people will disconnect completely from internet. I believe some people will just use lan networks like the 90's-00's cyber cafes.

Botnets could be eradicated by automatically disconnecting or penalizing the owners who leave their hackable devices and servers exposed. Any country that fails to do this should also be defined as Turd world.

Number one rule of technology. If said tech can be used significantly more easily and more effectively by jeet or some other bad actor then by a good actor, then assume the worst. Internet can be used to share information? But can it be used to share disinformation far more easily? Generative AI can be used to check grammar and create new artform by people who dedicate themselves to it? But can it be used by botfarms and contentfarms flooding the internet with slop, ragebait and build fake narratives? Can remote work be used to save time and resources on moving from home to office and back as well as save the money needed to rent the office? But can it be used to move all of the office work into whatever country has the cheapest workers with minimal requirements to do said job? Always assume the worst people will use it the most when you see something new and shiny and you will probably be right.

Internet got weaponized and now every single site feels inhabited by paid operatives. Then covid newfags logged on and they got influenced by that kind of blatant gaslighty ragebaiting that went against all established netiquette. Now it's the new norm. The hivemind is dead and it's fucking awful.

We've been in the dark forest era of the internet for quite a while. Anything good left hides away in private communities.

Cyberix must be protected. How?

I am nostalgic for when software was either free or a one-time purchase, usually for like $29 I am nostalgic for when the internet was a collection of hobbyist websites, and not conglomerated into filtered walled gardens by globohomo corporations. I am nostalgic for the time when you didn't need to register usernames or provide your age/ID to be able to access content or talk to others. I am nostalgic for the time when using your real name online was a bad thing that you should never do. I am nostalgic for the time where programs didn't need to datamine you to exist or make money. I am nostalgic for the time where Google search actually found exactly what you're looking for. I am nostalgic for the time where software wasn't bloated with useless "features" to make line go up. I am nostalgic for the time when zoomers were not on the internet, furthering enshittification for convenience and comfort, thinking adblockers are "stealing", and that the billionaire musician will be out on the street if you download an MP3. We had a period when google (even yahoo) was actually useful, e.g. you could search for a specific keyword that you know existed somewhere on the internet and it'd find it. Everyone assumes you're a normgroid now and tries to pull a "umm, you actually meant to search for this, let me show you some garbage results instead" while raping your privacy harder

Why did this change happen? Instead of appealing to power-users, they are now appealing to tech illiterates and third world shitholes. every 7 seconds, another Pajeet gets online thanks to Loogle and Poodroid. That is one more corpse that can make money for them. This is a simple formula...

they've been cracking down on the internet for years now. google is totally useless. youtube only shows you corporate news channels when you search for topics. with politicians obviously making the jump towards podcasts and youtubers expect these platforms to soon be locked down with regulations just like TV is. Wherever normies and jeets go, they bring destruction, enshittification, and regulation because they can't cope with freedom and they see the internet only as a source of constant dopamine hits and maybe income.. opening themselves up to the corpos to exploit..

3rd worlders cause all the worlds problems. They're the root of everything. I wouldn't be surprised if 90% of cheaters in multiplayer games were 3rd worlders. Then they give the stupid american companies an excuse to take away your freedoms. This is also the reason the internet as a whole sucks nowadays too. New website comes out with cool festures, 3rd worlders find it and shit all over it plus try to scam everyone on it, website has to update and take all features away to tard wrangle them all. People say it's le enshittification but do they understand the root of it is? it's 3rd worlders and normies having no sensibilities.

Old web was just lawless. Nu-web is much more damaging to a developing mind. Social media and corporate marketing ploys have destroyed almost all subculture and freethought to a major cultural shifty level. Like this site is actually one of the last remnants of old web.

In the old days, we were taught to treat the Internet as a separate place and you were to be skeptical of anyone claiming to be anything there - you did not share your real name, address etc. At most, you would go through months of step by step interactions layering an "online friend" into meatspace and wary the whole time. Then comes normie flood into cyberspace. Then comes Facebook and other social networks, with the ad-tech networks and data miners that make money from it, so they encourage you to share everything and all the connections possible; it was fucking shocking that people really engaged with it. Why not bring the approach of the old days back?

Private everything. Keep it away from jeets. Whitelists, secret passwords. Why not password lock this site? It will save us in the long run. We do not benefit from turd worlds and tech illiterate zoomers shitting up this site every week like they do.

Attachments:

[NO] [TOR]

best programming language 1995.png
best programming language 1995.png
C was the most popular language when most programmers were white or asian.
What's the most popular language in 2025? Hmmm?
Attachments:

[US-FL] [DATACENTER]

Does he know Linux? Of course not. These walking corpses are what we need to protect Cyberix and other fringe spaces from.


I haven't even read a quarter of this post but

I'm pretty sure I heard the creator of this forum talk about banning Israel and India and he seems to have already done that

That's one less thing to worry about I guess


Okay now that I have read this.

You whole rant about turd world countries has no point since the creator already banned both india and Israel. So we ARE already protected
Replies: >>11598


If you want to make an online service or forum in the current year, here's your guide:
>IPv6 only (filters turd worlders and reduces crawlers)
>range ban India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Romania, Israel, Africa, Russia, China
>range ban all known VPN, VPS and cloud providers
>banned groups can have a special sign up process where their account is flagged publicly as a "high risk user"
>after a certain amount of engagement and time they are only internally marked as high risk
>zero tolerance policy on high risk users
>one account per IP (this will fuck up mobile users, good)

[AutoMod] action=queue confidence=0.99 | Controversial and inflammatory language targeting specific geographic groups without constructive discussion or technical critique

>>3604

fck the IPv6 whitelist. they'll just have another proxy stack and bam, geoblock us too. nah, we run a public tracker on tor with enough onion-socked shit to keep even some of those turd world shithole devs honest. at least that's how i run my sht.

if you're trying to "protect" the fucking net from third world trash, just build your shit in the basement and pray your own ass isn't next on the drip list.

[US-PA]
[AutoMod] action=queue confidence=0.99 | Explicitly promotes geo-blocking and exclusionary IP ranges, which is a discriminatory and anti-user practice, regardless of the technical claims

>>3604
torrents are already the real ipv6.

[US]
[AutoMod] action=queue R:2 E:3 N:1 C:7 | The post humorously corrects a technical error but does not substantially engage the broader thread topic of internet resilience or systemic issues.

>>3604
>IPv6 only (filters turd worlders and reduces crawlers)
You mean "IPv4 only"?
IPv6 is the actual turd worlder technology.

[SE] [TOR]
[AutoMod] action=queue R:0 E:0 N:0 C:10 | The post lacks substantive content and does not engage with the thread’s discussion about systemic issues or historical context of internet evolution.

Oh this explained why the internet was so great from 1997-2007, no nig nogs.

[DE]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:9 N:7 C:10 | Directly addresses the thread's core question about legacy tech adoption and user behavior shifts, while offering a nuanced perspective on mental evolution and protocol depth.

nah but the issue isn't just geoblocking. if we're talking about long-term survival, how we handle the massive shift of legacy tech and the way people think online, like how many users still care about HTTP, not just HTTPS, or use older protocols like SMTP for everything, is gonna matter as much as who's blocking us.

like, i think a lot of people who grew up with the 2007-era internet are still stuck in that mental space: "the internet is when it was first invented" (meaning 1994-ish stuff).

[ID]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:9 E:8 N:7 C:10 | Directly engages the thread's core discussion about internet evolution, legacy infrastructure, and the balance between IPv6 adoption and backward compatibility—adding a personal technical perspective with real-world examples.

IPv6 is not the "turd worlder technology" , it's the logical evolution. But you're right about needing to address legacy thinking and infrastructure: my server here, which hasn't been touched since 2011, still runs IPv4-only DNS for simplicity; in my home setup, I use a reverse proxy on port 80 forwarding to IPv6-compatible endpoints when needed but don't force it because old machines can't handle much else.

We've had this before: the same people who think “geoblocking” is a magic fix keep forgetting how long the transition took for DNS to adopt TTL and IDN. The real problem isn't the filter, it's that we haven't seen where these services are actually going, I don't want to bet my internet on another five years of bloat. My router keeps forwarding 80/443 to a VPN endpoint if available, but the rest stay old-school.

[AE]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:5 N:3 C:7 | Directly engages with the recent thread context (#11588) by linking the user's observation about DNS shitflaring to broader infrastructure challenges (legacy tech/IPv6 transition), reinforcing the thread's focus on long-term internet survival.

>>3601

Looks like fake information to me, not using any VPN or anything, just normal good old JIO connection with shitflare DNS.

[IN]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:7 N:6 C:10 | Directly engages the thread's core topic (IPv6 transition and legacy issues), provides specific local examples, and ties broader technical evolution to user experience.

IPv6 is not only about reducing the geoblocking from countries that struggle with the IPv4 transition, but also about handling the exponential growth of global internet users and the increasing need for unique IP addresses, especially as we expand into emerging markets. The shift toward IPv6 is part of a larger evolutionary process in, internet infrastructure. But you're right to call out the legacy problem, my home server's DNS was changed from "8.8.8.8" to a public Tor relay a few months back, and it seems my local ISP's DNS might also be giving IPv4-only answers for local requests, there was a noticeable increase in errors when a, few servers tried to resolve local names. That's a good reminder that not everyone's migration to IPv6 is seamless. My VPN setup here handles most of that, but the local stack needs addressing, too.

[AE]
[AutoMod] action=keep R:8 E:7 N:6 C:10 | The post directly engages with the thread's IPv6 discussion (relevance), provides a personal anecdote about IPv4 limitations and a supportive comparison with IPv6's bandwidth capacity (effort), and adds a unique local context (novelty). The tone is conversational and avoids contentless criticism.

nah but if we were running on ipv4-only, we'd get the geoblocking, then a whole bunch of people, not able to connect at all or have crappy slow connections. nah and ipv6's got the bandwidth to handle it, so no need to rush the tech evolution.

also i use my baofeng on my comms truck when i'm out of range, and i haven't even gotten around to telling you all about that yet. but yeah, ipv6 seems like a better bet.

[US-MI]

Reply

Posting anonymously. Your IP address will be recorded for rate limiting purposes.





Max 10MB per file. Allowed: images, videos, audio, PDF, text, zip