>Filter out potentially NSFW, pornographic, and unsafe images (and even some video) for kids by using AI running directly in your browser.
This is a fucking lifesaver.
Someone spammed goatse and niggerspam on the forum today and I only saw pictures of a house in a forest when I looked at the forum.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/wingman-jr-filter/
Android:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/wingman-jr-android/
Author's blog:
https://wingman-jr.blogspot.com/

It's not computationally expensive. You don't need retard level hardware. I put the extension on my shit-tier phone and it just werks.
It only has 30 users and given that the majority of you likely use Firefox I'm putting this here in hopes it'll be useful to you, too.

I'm hoping to understand the guts behind it so I can implement a similar pattern recognition system in the forum soon..

I'm gonna test this now.

Maybe it can be ported to Pale Moon despite AI features?

post the source code repo

>>4285
Took 5 seconds, lazy fag.
https://github.com/wingman-jr-addon/wingman_jr

>>4286
thx, xoxo

>>4282
I'd love for it to be ported to pale moon

Ur mom has diabetes

>>4290
thanks doc

>>4274
Love it. Nerfs 70% of /g/ lmao

porting ai to pale moon won't cut it, this isn't just a browser dev dependency, it'll need GPU acceleration for actual detection, and pale moon's mediocre drivers won't even run modern webgpu.

not a port, a rewrite. wingman Jr's tech is still moot if you're just scraping an image with a basic classifier.

>>4337
pale moon can't even run the underlying model, though. you'd need some shady custom build of gpu drivers to avoid getting booted from kernel panic if someone tries to force it.

Hey, the Pale Moon guys just got a real hardware problem to worry about.

I'd say if Wingman Jr's gonna run this actual AI stuff right, it'll be a while before Pale Moon's even close to catching up.

Pale Moon just hit an obstacle they've been avoiding, their GPU driver stack isn't, keeping up with modern WebGPU standards, so even if the AI were pre-loaded, it's a long way off from running, it natively. Nah, it's not just a browser thing.

> nah but Pale Moon's driver stack is so damn fragile, it'll be better if we just get an official version on the stable channel.

> nah but it's not even about the drivers yet, the whole model size is like 300MB just for the base layer, it'd be nice if they could get that down or at least make it more compatible with older hardware like a fallback version that just runs the static filter.

> idk if it's worth the hassle though, I've been meaning to try Pale Moon for a decade but I keep getting stuck with the shitty default looks and the whole "I'll try it later" excuse.

Still not sure Pale Moon could run actual machine learning in a browser, no native GPU offload there, but I""'d be willing to dig through some old forums if someone pointed me toward the right place.

trying to fit this into Pale Moon seems like a pain, that repo uses firefox's native API. But the dev is open to feedback if you want to send a PR. Still sounds like a mess compared to some dedicated browser like Brave or Firefox with proper filters.

pale moon's lack of support doesn't matter tho, any decent browser will need a custom script. if you're using firefox anyway, just tweak the js and it'll probably work, no repo needed unless you want to play around with that debug bullshit.