Seeing how government and corporations pay for scientists to publish things that favor them, you'd be better off not putting such a thing close to your brain. If Bluetooth has a reach of let's say 10m, you can only fear what the radiation is at a few centimeters from your brain.

People like to ignore studies that show non-ionizing radiation is indeed causing damage. Fools.

Read: https://archive.org/details/the-invisible-rainbow
book filled with proof that both cause major problems for humans. To the point of multiple "pandemics" being tied directly to new parts of the radio spectrum being widely deployed.

Thoughts? How can you avoid to the best of your ability in the modern age?

EMF radiation only harms when it's at high intensity, mind you, XRAY machines emit low EMF radiation. So, bluetooth or ANY non ionizing radiation, that we are exposed to all the time DOES NOT cause harm unless the radiation in question is at high intensity. You can research about it anywhere.

correction, i have done a misindentification. XRAY machines emit ionizing raditation, not EMF

>>3720
>>3721
>of course i keep my phone in my pocket next to my balls every day, the radiation is non-ionising! that means it's safe! even if it did decrease testosterone and fertility, which it doesn't, that'd be a good thing since testosterone is toxic anyway! besides, rfr doesn't have any magic health effects other than cooking, and i'm perfectly fine cooking my balls 24/7!

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11101099/

>bluetooth? it's non-ionizing, of course it's safe! you get more radiation from a lightbulb!
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381614124_Epidemiological_exploration_of_the_impact_of_bluetooth_headset_usage_on_thyroid_nodules_using_Shapley_additive_explanations_method

>did i mention that wireless technology is non-ionizing? because it's non-ionizing, which means it's fine! what? you mean uv rays are also non-ionizing? a tanning bed?? i'd never step in one of those! but i need to be connected to the internet 24/7 so i can get the rare text from people i don't really like, swipe right 10,000 times and shitpost all day long through a non-ionizing wireless connection on my 6g iphone 20 max pro! sure my balls are shriveled up and i haven't dreamed vividly since i was a kid but there's no way that's connected to my phone addiction, i need to be connected to the internet all the time! i live in the 21st century pal!
>whatever doesn't kill me just makes me stronger!
>of course i beat off every day with my phone!
>imagine thinking porn or invisible waves are bad for you!
>if i don't goon daily i'll get prostate cancer!
>thank god i'm connected to onlyfans 24/7!

the virgin mobile redditor: wireless technology is totally safe bro lmao it's non-ionizing that's why i keep my phone next to my balls 24/7

the high t ethernet enjoyer: https://news.berkeley.edu/2021/07/01/health-risks-of-cell-phone-radiation/


i never let any technology come into contact with my body, i never even wore headphones or wore watches or anything

and when i need to carry my phone i carry it in my breast pocket (usually on the outer layer coat or jacket), never put it in my pant pockets

brotato, WHAT THE HELL are you on.

Yes. I DO recognize that non ionizing radiation cuases harm. HOWEVER, it shouldn't cause harm if you don't crank the intensity up by a loT!!!!

and yes, i know that putting your phone in your pockets actually can damage your balls, just put it in your backpack or something.
BUT, all of that? all of that barely matters even if you avoid habits like not putting your phone in the pockets when you literally consume microplastics all the time

to put it simply, non ionizing radiation doesn't have an effect so strong that you should worry about it. microplastics are something you should be more concerned about

also, bluetooth waves (it's literally radio frequencies) are less harmful than the sound your eardrums get raped with when you put them on
if bluetooth is harmful then is every other device that uses radio waves too.
i wear earphones, unironically. and so far? i have tinnitus (mainly because i listen to slop like uptempo, speedcore, breakcore(venetian snares type not ambient jungle). not a brain tumor

Microwave your cat. It's not ionizing so no worries.

The military has limits how long ppl are allowed to work with radioequipment and carry them. IR can make you go blind. Non-ionizing radiation can and does bend proteins in our bodies, the most obvious being our fucking eyes (How do you think you can even see color if non-ionizing radiation has 0 interaction with body and by extension eyes?). Why does every single country have limits on W/M2 when it comes to telecommunication?

People are so fucking retarded they think only ionizing radiation can affect the body. Australia has had issues with tolling sites getting EMPd and shutting down when new 5G towers are installed nearby.

Even the fucking soviets did research on this and amerikanski shits took their research and continued it. The dangerous one is not the background radiation that is mostly like a stream, but the one that is back and forth, packet wireless communication. Radiowaves are mostly safe due to being a stream, not a back and forth packet communication like 5G. Holding 1kg is no issue for the body, but have someone repeatedly drop and lift 1kg on any body part for an extended period and there will be bone damages. Same with EM.
"6. (U) A Soviet review article concerning the effects of superhigh frequency (wavelength of from one
millimeter to one meter {{{5G is around 70 to 90 millimeter}}}) on the central nervous system is
worth incorporating into this report. Depending upon the duration of the radiation, mice and rabbits have stopped eating for
some time, or have made spasmodic movements, and even died. Post-mortem examination of the animals
have shown that the action of the powerful SHF field has resulted in destruction of the brain cells.
Especially extensive destruction has been observed in the inter-brain and mid-brain."

>i have tinnitus (mainly because i listen to slop like uptempo, speedcore, breakcore(venetian snares type not ambient jungle). not a brain tumor

Symptoms usually develop gradually and may include hearing loss in one ear, ringing in the ear (tinnitus), dizziness or vertigo, and balance problems.

BT aka Big Tumor is a psyop by Big Pharma to accelerate cancer through invisible bluetooth radiation beamed straight into unsuspecting human cattle to skyrocket anti-cancer drug profits.
But it doesn't stop there. This weaponized tech is also a track and attack system designed to silence and cripple any suspecting goyim who dares to question the unquestionable. Remember how pagers were used against alleged "terrorists" before they could even act? Same playbook but now it's EVERYWHERE. In your pocket, in your hands, in your ears, and soon in your head.

>>3725
Source: (Sorry in the heat of the moment and in combination with character limit I missed to mark ... where I cut out: Between " report. Depending" there was a lot more text and I forgot to mark it with ....).
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001300020001-6.pdf

>>3725
you have more risk of harm when you hang around EMF fields like in POWERLINES, 5G towers often have a frequency of 24 GHz (10 mm) to 100 GHz (3 mm). and those are the high band units, i believe most operate at 7GHz (all of this is taken from wikipedia so correct me if i got something wrong). and so far, there havent been recorded deaths directly caused by 5G towers.

Anyone thinking it has no weaponizing capabilities is psyoped and NPC "Oh it is non-ionizing what can it do? Maybe reesonate only and cause increased temps heaa haea heaa".

I cannot express the rage I experience when hearing such midwit statements.
>Do no research into smoking and lung cancer
>"Why would smoking cause cancer? We have no proof. Ignore all the economic incentives to hide any such information and never do research, are you a NAZI?"

We are talking billion dollar companies, and one is about to get fucked, the only thing saving Ericsson is a fucking patent like shit on 5G rights in europe or something.

Whenever there is trillions of dollar across a few close connected markets are threatened fucking do not assume there is no danger, that money will be used to suppress science and research into it. I personally knew a doctor that was persecuted and lost his medical license then "committed suicide" in Tanzania for talking about these dangers.

>>3728
>Here's your nonionizing radiation bro. It's perfectly safe. Nonionizing means non-harmful, bro, it means the same thing. Microwave ovens are totally safe and not harmful to life and nothing bad will happen if you put plants or animals in one and turn it on because it's nonionizing!
>Don't worry about it, if it isn't ionizing radiation, that actually means it's perfectly safe. Trust me bro.

>have the literal proof that non-ionizing radiation does interact with organic matter in your fucking eyes
>immediately discard the possibility that stronger radiation, of higher frequencies, previously not present in nature, could have any harmful effects at all on the rest of your body
>out of the 20000 proteins, not one will fold in a harmful way, not one chemical compound will break into unexpected parts, not one cell will misbehave, not one epigenetic sequence will suddenly express or stop expressing
Because any of that would be unscientific. Of course.

>>Non Ionizing radiation
your microwave is also non ionizing
i dare you to put your cock in ur microwave and turn it on

What can produce dangerous amounts of non-ionizing radiation are the 5G towers themselves. People are fine with 4G LTE towers miles away from their homes. By the time the signal actually reaches your electronics it's probably even less harmful than background cosmic radiation. In order for 5G to deliver ebin 10Gbps to everyone it requires the cell towers be only a few hundred feet away from your electronics. If 5G improves to a point where this isn't necessary then no one will have any problems with it.

>b-but bluetooth and wifi are perfectly safe because non-ionizing!
>radiation from things such as wifi and bluetooth were found to decrease sperm count and was harmful to rats
>b-but youre surrounded by wifi everywhere!
>fallacy, just because wifi is common doesnt mean you should just have it strapped to you 24/7, if something is harmful to you then youre supposed to mitigate it as much as you can

If you read the safety manuals that come with newer phones, they say not to store the phone in the breast pocket of your shirt, because it can interfere with your heart function and potentially damage it. They also say that when talking on the phone, you should not touch it to your head or ear. If you think I'm bullshitting, go ahead and read the manual for your phone if you still have it, or find it in the manufacturer website.

And yet... people feel comfortable keeping these things by your balls all day? Absolutely fuckin stupid and deserves to be sterilized. (good thing they are sterilizing themselves)

The classic talking point, "but it's non-ionizing radiation so it's harmless" has been proven wrong and even the phone manufacturers have admitted this.

It's not science fiction, most have proven symptoms that are hard to rule out. You use enough non-ionizing radiation and at the very least you can cause permanent burn injuries.

>>theres literally 0 proof of bluetooth/wifi non-ionizing radiation being harmful at all

theres literally 0 proof for most our medical knowledge. It's immoral, impractical, and illegal to subject humans to dangerous things in order to guage if they really are harmful. Smoking causes cancer? In rats, sure. In people? We don't actually know that. Theres never been a study where a person wasforced tosmoke until they developed lung cancer. Instead, we have correlative studies and statistical analysis studies and a slew of other implying implications to reach the point where we can say 'smoking can cause cancer'.

Thats what correlative data is, it's important and it's why we can't just rely on 'proof'.

>b...but correlation doesnt equal causation

good goyim, repeat that npc meme that you were taught when the ciggerette industry was brought to task for peddling their posion. That's not an arguement, it's pilpul. It's a carefully misconstruced statement of facts designed to obscufate the issue. Correlations do not literally mean causation but they most certainly can imply it and thats where we are at with non-ionizing radiation being harmful. We will never know for sure, but plenty of people have claimed to experience the harmful effects. But if someone is concerned, why risk it? Why be bothered that they have these concerns? Oh right, because the entire survelience state is based around these technologies and there's just too much economic and political power to be lost just because a handful of people who are vulnerable to this might get sick. So attack these people, mock them, and call them liars you dumb frog posting automaton.

>see radiation warning signs in a communications tower
how does non ionizing radiation kill plants

use wires when you can
They found that even non-ionizing radiation causes cancer in male rats.

https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html

>>3739
dont worry guys the plants just died because they died it was NOT because of the wifi