The 2000s "Old Internet" Transgender/nu-politik cult
0 attachments
Started >30d ago
Part of the appeal of old internet to me was that all this nonsense didn't exist. Yes, I love the shitty, tacky aesthetics. But it was way more open. People always lament about the wild west of the internet without realizing that they are the ones preventing that with their attempts at censorship and controlling speech that they deem not progressive enough. Yes there were small crazy communities but this restrictive nonsense where you get ostracized for not going along with it did not exist, and that's part of what made it superior to the modern internet.
I'm being extremely autistic about this but idk it makes me MATI. They have no real appreciation for the old internet. They cry about how evil and bigoted the real thing was because people weren't sucking troon cock back then. What's the point of bringing the the old internet back if you put one of the biggest problems with the modern internet into it? It's not authentic or comparable to the real thing at all. It's just troon virtue signaling with a geocities-themed coat of paint. A completely shallow, hollow imitation. That's what pisses me off the most.
It's another thing troons have co-opted and ruined. 2000s art styles, internet, fashion have a special place in my heart. But it's been completely infected by this nonsense to the point where you can't avoid it if you want to participate. And again, they don't even really seem to appreciate it for what it actually was, just use the old aesthetic with their modern sensibilities while talking badly about the era itself for how problematic it was.
https://cy-x.net/forum/topic/digital-cargo-cult-how-zoomers-ruined-old-internet-nostalgia/91
But when someone wears a trench coat in public, it becomes a hazard or an issue?
If it's not buttoned, no one would mind, but if it's buttoned up and you ""walk in a weird way"", people suspect you either have a gun in your coat, or a suicide vest.
>JUST troons (or more accurately, Gender Identity Disorder patients)!? I think its also Zoomer autists in at large, not just brain-damaged and mentally scrambled fools who were often abused as children or early teens
It's their general go-to excuse if they're ever questioned about being a troon. You'll see that a lot and within common with other troons.
A common theme goes like this ᯂ: why are you a troon? 𐊾: Because I was abused as a kid and teen, so that's why I am a troon! ᯂ: ok but I do not care, why are you a troon? 𐊾: same reason goes here, + I am ""SCIENTIFICALLY"" a woman in a man's body!
As this went on, scientists with no descriptive thought decided to follow up and agree with troons later on. They always play the victim card, these trannies are ruining the part of life of taking the fault, but they have to play victim card whenever they're called a pedophile or a kid-fucker.
These trans people can go dally on in and groom little kids and recieve less fault. This is the action of society we live in.
fuck you
Why does right wing bullshit have to infest every fucking corner of the internet?
You didn't actually respond to anything here and resorted to an emotional response instead.
Do you actually have anything to say other than "you have different politics than I do and thats bad"?
and you don't see how flipped your argument? while you complain about troons infest every corner if the net, anon complains about right wings infest every corner
about how troons use "abused as a child" as an excuse, y'know that it's a valid reason next to their other """excuses""" like not being comfortable in their own body etc. but i also think that is a mental illness still being abused as a child is a valid enough reason, like right wingers hating niggas because they stole their bike
about how they are everywhere that is normal, personal sites wsre always about personal expression, and as much as they can do whatever they want on their sites, (you) can do what you want on yours, that's how it always has been so i don't really get your issue
Some actually good sites:
https://www.macroevolution.net/
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html
https://hackerfactor.com/
http://antiquecannabisbook.com/
https://www.planecrashinfo.com/
https://qualiacomputing.com/
https://paranormalis.com/
Take note of how these sites aren't just a "hi, i am here page" with contact info. Or a edgy manifesto complaining about "trans people ruining the internet" or some other reactionary brainrot. These sites provide information which is useful, entertaining, and engaging. They are also note worthy enough to be revisited multiple times.
If you think lgbtq+ people can't blog check this out https://april.nekoweb.org/blog.html?v=7.4.1RS
Thats all and fuck you (:
obvious bait is obvious. those "actually good sites" have actually been there since the 90s.
>Like it or not your just as much of a reason we can't have nice things.
>If you think lgbtq+ people can't blog check this out [shilling]
quit flooding the forums with emotional blabbering that's on par with a 12 year old attempting to look cool to his discord clique. your shitty blog can't even load on netscape 7 and its contents make it incredibly clear that you're just a cookie-cutter zoomer who has nothing unique to say
i bet you can't describe what the "old internet" you idolize so much even is without resorting to regurgitating cocaine-addled delusions you absorbed from some video-essay you saw in a video essay commentated by a 17 year old with led-lights all over his fucking room
You right. The issue with the modern web isn't corporate shit, social media, ads, algorithms, javascript... The problem is it's too gay. Write interesting stuff? Na, that won't fix anything because gay stuff is the issue not content that sucks. In fact complaining about gay stuff is the best. Israel killing children? The gays did it. Housing prices? The gays did it. Age verification laws? The gays did it. My dog hates me and my mom will not even look at my anymore? The gays did it. This is soooo much easier than trying to find the cause of problems. Just blame the gays. A world leader just said they bet I can't blame the gays even harder. I got to prove them wrong and blame the gays harder to prove my hate to those libtards. At this rate I will never find the cause to my issues and that is great because I can say comfortable and numb in my hamster ball built on blame. Thank you for enlightening me.
> your shitty blog can't even load on netscape 7
That ain't my shitty blog. It's a example I found somewhere in my bookmarks which renders just fine in palemoon with javascript disabled.
This is my shitty blog https://shittyweb.org/blog/index.xhtml
nta but you are a paranoid schizophrenic
> nta but you are a paranoid schizophrenic
The gays did it.
>More often than not on forums and chatrooms everyone just starts calling me mentally ill and makes any real discussion impossible.
Can you elaborate more on this unexplained phenomenon?
^ retard
^ retard for not saying this earlier
>They have no real appreciation for the old internet. They cry about how evil and bigoted the real thing was because people weren't sucking troon cock back then. What's the point of bringing the the old internet back if you put one of the biggest problems with the modern internet into it?
why didn't 2390 respond to the actual OP? flamewar attempt?
> Can you elaborate more on this unexplained phenomenon?
Here is the neat part. You aren't going to listen. Why should I even try?
Anyways don't you hate it when the gays make the weather cold and gloomy? It is quite difficult fixing my tire out in the cold. Dam faggots need to stop putting nails in the road!
>Why should I even try?
I accept your concession.
> why didn't 2390 respond to the actual OP? flamewar attempt?
The gays did it. BTW why can't they stop making my power go out? Dam faggots.
everyone here is a retard and is the reason why we cant have nice things. you dumb fucks are too focused on calling each other a tranny or a bigot to actually DO shit on the internet. do you realize, do you realize that your infighting is the reason why small forums dont make it off the ground?
youre making it more deeper than it needs to be. focus on your own site, make it however the fuck you want. i would not walk into your house and tell you how to arrange your furniture, so why should you be worried on what other people think of it? why mourn the wild west of the internet when it is within your reach to bring it back. be however based or cringe you want, its your website, and if people hate it, they can close the tab and go suck their own dick. as for the countless sites of le 2000s aesthetucks, i am not worried about them. they are all a bunch of prepubescent teens who just got ahold of mommys old laptop and followed a website tutorial on jewtube. they will grow out of it eventually and make a boring links page. this too shall pass.
i dont give 2 shits of someone is a dickliker or not, it doesnt make you any more or less special. what pisses me off is when you make it your whole personality and vice versa. "grrr you hate gays" and "grrr youre gay" are both annoying copy-paste nonhumans. if i wanted to see this kind of endless argument i would log onto twitter.com
Also slightly off topic but one of the only examples I can think of in regards to a real revival of 90s/00s internet is the game Hypnospace. No current year nonsense, and it's shockingly accurate. I wish there was more of that sort of thing in the community, I'm sure there's some others out there who like the old web and aren't just wanting to trannify it. We just need to find each other and stick together I guess.
would like to quote this beautiful section I found on wikipedia:
>Simulacra and Simulation delineates the sign-order into four stages:
>The first stage is a faithful image/copy, where people believe, and may even be correct to believe, that a sign is a "reflection of a profound reality", this is a good appearance, in what Baudrillard called "the sacramental order".
>The second stage is perversion of reality, where people come to believe that the sign is an unfaithful copy, which "masks and denatures" reality as an "evil appearance—it is of the order of maleficence". Here, signs and images do not faithfully reveal reality to us, but can hint at the existence of an obscure reality which the sign itself is incapable of encapsulating.
>The third stage masks the absence of a profound reality, where the sign pretends to be a faithful copy, but it is a copy with no original. Signs and images claim to represent something real, but no representation is taking place and arbitrary images are merely suggested as things which they have no relationship to. Baudrillard calls this the "order of sorcery", a regime of semantic algebra where all human meaning is conjured artificially to appear as a reference to the (increasingly) hermetic truth.
>The fourth stage is pure simulacrum, in which the simulacrum has no relationship to any reality whatsoever. Here, signs merely reflect other signs and any claim to reality on the part of images or signs is only of the order of other such claims. This is a regime of total equivalency, where cultural products need no longer even pretend to be real in a naïve sense, because the experiences of consumers' lives are so predominantly artificial that even claims to reality are expected to be phrased in artificial, "hyperreal" terms. Any naïve pretension to reality as such is perceived as bereft of critical self-awareness, and thus as oversentimental.
Hopefully you understand what it says, this is just another level.
are all true btw