> here you go: https://archive.org/details/sizeofcat-2025-05-26.tar
Could you please reupload the .tar file? It's been taken down since.
sizeofcat on the IRC believes administration should be responsible for their privacy
> here you go: https://archive.org/details/sizeofcat-2025-05-26.tar
Could you please reupload the .tar file? It's been taken down since.
> here you go: https://archive.org/details/sizeofcat-2025-05-26.tar
The site is still down as of March 17th. The site responds to ping requests but doesn't have the actual site up, and the archive link is down.
The site is still down as of March 17th. The site responds to ping requests but doesn't have the actual site up, and the archive link is down.
Damn I miss him :( he was mostly a nice guy, sad he didn't provide cafe Archive before going.
Replies: >>11334
The way people are talking here about sizeof, I don't think you deserve an archive of the cafe.
Replies: >>11477
Well I was a member (:
And bs said he will provide before going away or shutting down the cafe but he didn't do that ):
Just wanted to respond to this. I am one of the people that made the new place where some of the old cafe members hang out. I am not the same person that made this thread. A lot of people have been confused by that :')
Replies: >>18120
As the one who started this thread, I'll confirm I have nothing to do with any refugee hub of sizeofcat members. I wasn't even really aware of him or his site prior to the events documented in this thread, nor did I know it was anything beyond a blog. I simply judged this person by the character they presented at the time and it resulted in a poor reaction.
Hope this helps.
I'm confused , Why wouldn't someone want a name on a website?
Replies: >>18136
I get the idea that much of it comes from the identity-changing that has occurred on most websites where all information is cross-referenced to the point where any handle you COULD use would invariably link back to you in some capacity. That said, I don't think this forum is doing that kind of metadata analysis.
The "they're filming me in a public room" line of thought isn't something people should encourage simply because the three-letters have only expanded 'public room' to be 'the entirety of the outdoors and some places in your home near electronic equipment', and on that line I can see the train of thought. On the line of posting on the anonymous imageboard where I choose to make my name into a Mike Matei Inspector Gadget joke, it seems like paranoia.