>>19729
Xiaomi already had this in 2021
Even cameras aren't safe from slop anymore.
LOUNGE · Back to threads · Report thread
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 16:13:28
>>19749
This is utterly retarded and antithetical to the camera as a concept.
This is utterly retarded and antithetical to the camera as a concept.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 16:45:20
>>19738
>agresive sharpening, flat tones, no contrast, overly bright, overly colourful, stupid filters and skin softening ai shit.
Take the poorfag pill.
>made by HMD which are leftovers of the original Nokia before Microshaft ruined them
>cost me 80 bucks new
>no glass shit lol all plastic but it still feels really sturdy and not flimsy at all
>replaceable battery
>3.5mm headphone jack
and
>makes photos that don't seem augmented at all
The photos aren't great by 2020s standards but they seem like 2015 photos with the normal grain removal but with no AI shit yet.
I got it just to do phonecalls and occasional photos on my way and it's stellar for that. It also didn't come with bloat (apart from normal ass android) which I also like. /g/ will call it outdated piece of shit but I appreciate how simple it is and I hate buying used phones so it's perfect value for me and exactly what I wanted.
Sadly it's a dying breed and I doubt the successor will be as honest as this phone is
>agresive sharpening, flat tones, no contrast, overly bright, overly colourful, stupid filters and skin softening ai shit.
Take the poorfag pill.
>made by HMD which are leftovers of the original Nokia before Microshaft ruined them
>cost me 80 bucks new
>no glass shit lol all plastic but it still feels really sturdy and not flimsy at all
>replaceable battery
>3.5mm headphone jack
and
>makes photos that don't seem augmented at all
The photos aren't great by 2020s standards but they seem like 2015 photos with the normal grain removal but with no AI shit yet.
I got it just to do phonecalls and occasional photos on my way and it's stellar for that. It also didn't come with bloat (apart from normal ass android) which I also like. /g/ will call it outdated piece of shit but I appreciate how simple it is and I hate buying used phones so it's perfect value for me and exactly what I wanted.
Sadly it's a dying breed and I doubt the successor will be as honest as this phone is
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 16:49:56
Why did you post a picture of Superman, OP?
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 16:57:20
>>19781
Which phone is that? I can only find like 3 decent phones from them, 2 are IPS, 1 has OLED screen but no phone jack.
Which phone is that? I can only find like 3 decent phones from them, 2 are IPS, 1 has OLED screen but no phone jack.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 17:01:26
>>19783
>decent
Depends on how you define that.
In terms of technology it's kinda on 2017/18 level and yes it's IPS and not a stunning display.
For me to occasionally browse the web and do phone calls and some pics it's great. It's the normal HMD Pulse, no plus or pro.
>decent
Depends on how you define that.
In terms of technology it's kinda on 2017/18 level and yes it's IPS and not a stunning display.
For me to occasionally browse the web and do phone calls and some pics it's great. It's the normal HMD Pulse, no plus or pro.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 17:07:08
>>19747
This is probably one of those things where it looks good if you're totally uninterested in photography, but if you have even a surface level interest in it, it looks like shit.
Anons who are into photography let me know if I'm right
>T. Cameracel
This is probably one of those things where it looks good if you're totally uninterested in photography, but if you have even a surface level interest in it, it looks like shit.
Anons who are into photography let me know if I'm right
>T. Cameracel
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 17:25:33
>>19729
>anymore
Phone cameras have relied on AI post-processing for years by now
>anymore
Phone cameras have relied on AI post-processing for years by now
the explainer · reply · 2026-07-10 17:29:32
>>19777
she does if you marry her
she does if you marry her
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 17:29:53
>>19738
protip everything you listed is in the stock camera app software, the lenses and sensors are still good so just get a third party app that bypasses that shit
protip everything you listed is in the stock camera app software, the lenses and sensors are still good so just get a third party app that bypasses that shit
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 17:30:41
>>19786
luddites don't care, they are too far gone coz of hrt
luddites don't care, they are too far gone coz of hrt
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 17:41:18
>>19747
Counter-argument: Here's a 2014 point and shit smaller than a modern phone (downscaled 50% because site still has shit upload limits)
>>19786
No, they're retarded in thinking it's a new issue, the real solution is getting an actual camera
Counter-argument: Here's a 2014 point and shit smaller than a modern phone (downscaled 50% because site still has shit upload limits)
>>19786
No, they're retarded in thinking it's a new issue, the real solution is getting an actual camera
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 17:42:02
I find it funny how much people bitch about cameras everywhere yet their hous is full of smart devices and they carry around the latest smart phone
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 17:44:11
>>19747
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 17:44:33
>>19748
Because you're stupid. Outside of a certain segment of hobbyists, everyone else is using their smartphone camera.
Because you're stupid. Outside of a certain segment of hobbyists, everyone else is using their smartphone camera.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 19:08:02
you don't sneed more
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 21:45:25
>>19747
>that hideus hdr
Are you Brazilian?
>that hideus hdr
Are you Brazilian?
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 21:50:35
SOVL
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 21:57:31
>>19738
Here's your entry level camera
Here's your entry level camera
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 22:10:04
>>19797
>unrivalled af
fr? sheesh
>unrivalled af
fr? sheesh
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 22:23:18
>>19775
TRUE!! fpbp /thread xD
TRUE!! fpbp /thread xD
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 22:40:34
>>19747
Nice glowing rocks faggot
Nice glowing rocks faggot
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 22:43:58
>>19739
As far as I know they don't outright replace things in the image.
As far as I know they don't outright replace things in the image.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 23:16:55
>>19797
You can get a brand new DSLR for 300-500
You can get a brand new DSLR for 300-500
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 01:45:20
>>19748
zoomers already using cameras and old phones for their photos
zoomers already using cameras and old phones for their photos
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 02:05:13
>>19747
Not gonna ngl this shit looks like it's been AI upscaled from 480x640
Looks good from afar but at 100% scale it's absolute dogshit smear.
Not gonna ngl this shit looks like it's been AI upscaled from 480x640
Looks good from afar but at 100% scale it's absolute dogshit smear.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 02:10:42
>>19752
And how do you process them?
And how do you process them?
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 02:26:27
>>19747
That water looks like shit. Either the image got completely crushed or the lighting is fucking with it.
That water looks like shit. Either the image got completely crushed or the lighting is fucking with it.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 02:51:03
>>19748
>Why do I have the feeling that standalone digital cameras will be making a comeback?
Newgens seem to like point-and-shoots. My ~8MP shitty-cam seems to go over well with them.
>Why do I have the feeling that standalone digital cameras will be making a comeback?
Newgens seem to like point-and-shoots. My ~8MP shitty-cam seems to go over well with them.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 02:58:49
>>19729
NO IT'S SUPERMAN
NO IT'S SUPERMAN
Hansen smith · reply · 2026-07-11 03:12:03
504 2276-4370, guys call this number please
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 04:16:30
>>19809
nypa
nypa
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 05:46:22
>>19748
market always been small or nonexistent
market always been small or nonexistent
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 05:48:57
>>19794
solargraphy cannot into color image
solargraphy cannot into color image
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 06:19:06
>>19801
you can always tell it's a filthy jeet posting this webm because the moon's craters literally look nothing like this. this is a filthy streetlamp. anyone who has skies that aren't too smoggy to let them see the moon immediately knows this is not a moon photo.
you can always tell it's a filthy jeet posting this webm because the moon's craters literally look nothing like this. this is a filthy streetlamp. anyone who has skies that aren't too smoggy to let them see the moon immediately knows this is not a moon photo.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 06:25:09
>>19740
>mistake
the need of such images is a proof of computational photography working
it's just manufacturer scaled the algorithm way too beyond what it's really capable for various reasons
>mistake
the need of such images is a proof of computational photography working
it's just manufacturer scaled the algorithm way too beyond what it's really capable for various reasons
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 06:26:24
>>19757
>t.
>t.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 06:32:32
>>19815
anon might notice stylish email adress
anon might notice stylish email adress
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 06:48:39
>>19747
Look at this nigga leaving his basement!
Look at this nigga leaving his basement!
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 06:51:11
>>19748
Because it's been happening for a while already? Both DSLR/mirrorless and (fir whatever reason) Polaroids have been increasing in popularity for at least a few years now.
Because it's been happening for a while already? Both DSLR/mirrorless and (fir whatever reason) Polaroids have been increasing in popularity for at least a few years now.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 06:52:45
>>19815
The richest man in Babylon...
The richest man in Babylon...
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 06:55:31
>>19818
>>19748
I have never ever been able to actually take a good quality picture with any phone camera I've ever had. They all suck ass no matter how many whatever.
>>19748
I have never ever been able to actually take a good quality picture with any phone camera I've ever had. They all suck ass no matter how many whatever.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 07:45:10
>>19820
Some Sony phone cameras are okay, but they're still worse than a ten year old DSLR.
Some Sony phone cameras are okay, but they're still worse than a ten year old DSLR.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 10:15:34
>>19813
saar, that's the point of the webm saar
saar, that's the point of the webm saar
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 10:36:23
>>19747
I can't tell if ppl are trolling. This looks fine to me. This is like audiophiles insisting two identical songs have a difference. Maybe because I'm not a photofag
I can't tell if ppl are trolling. This looks fine to me. This is like audiophiles insisting two identical songs have a difference. Maybe because I'm not a photofag
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 10:42:30
>>19823
Look at >>19770, the rocks look like someone applied a paintbrush filter
Look at >>19770, the rocks look like someone applied a paintbrush filter
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 10:46:53
>>19824
I guess. No lie it just looks like grass and rocks to me. Maybe my eyes are bad or I just don't care enough
I guess. No lie it just looks like grass and rocks to me. Maybe my eyes are bad or I just don't care enough
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 11:49:10
>>19814
>computational photography working
A Photogrash should be nothing more than the capture of the light rays VERBATIM.
Anything else is the camera manufacturer coping with their product's flaws trying to fool the viewer.
>computational photography working
A Photogrash should be nothing more than the capture of the light rays VERBATIM.
Anything else is the camera manufacturer coping with their product's flaws trying to fool the viewer.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 12:20:13
>>10924909
good implementation work as a ray aggregator\
good implementation work as a ray aggregator\
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-11 12:22:18
>>19729
>Even cameras aren't safe from slop anymore.
phones have been doing this shit for like 10 years
>Even cameras aren't safe from slop anymore.
phones have been doing this shit for like 10 years
‹ Newer posts Page 2 of 3 Older posts ›
Reply to this thread
Posting requires a durable account or a TripPass. Reading remains available.
Sign in or create or attach a TripPass to post. Browsing is open.