#8046 Anonymous — 2026-07-10 21:45:28 — REPORT — QUOTE
What do you use or recommend?
Replies (0): none
#8047 Anonymous — 2026-07-10 21:52:12 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
You do not need ClearURLs with uBO - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DandelionSprout/adfilt/refs/heads/master/LegitimateURLShortener.txt
Do not use Decentraleyes, it is outdated and only fucks up your fingerprint.
Do not use Enhancer for YouTube, it is completely worthless, just get YTNeuter Filterlist for uBO.
Do not use Privacy Badger with uBO - Dashboard > Filter Lists > Enable Privacy Badger equivalent filters, those 2 addons fight eachother and work worse than having just one; "Do NOT use uBO with any other content blocker. uBO performs as well as or better than most popular blockers. Other blockers can prevent uBO's privacy or anti-blocker-defusing features from working correctly." & https://www.debugbear.com/blog/chrome-extensions-website-performance#the-impact-of-ad-blocking-on-website-performance
The rest of your addons is pretty much bloatware, except SponsorBlock if you REALLY want to watch bad YouTube content creators.
>What do you use
Properly configured uBO, nothing else.
Replies (0): none
#8048 Anonymous — 2026-07-10 22:21:31 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
uBO and Violentmonkey to disable YouTube age verification without making a Google account.
Replies (0): none
#8049 Anonymous — 2026-07-10 22:27:35 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
imagus
multi account containers
Replies (0): none
#8050 Anonymous — 2026-07-10 23:15:07 — REPORT — QUOTE
bloatware thread
Replies (0): none
#8051 Anonymous — 2026-07-10 23:43:01 — REPORT — QUOTE
this+betterfox is all you need
Replies (0): none
#8052 Anonymous — 2026-07-10 23:48:38 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
rename tabs as bookmarks is useful for when i keep a lot of tabs open and want to remember why i have a specific one open, ill just give it a note via the bookmark
Replies (0): none
#8053 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 00:09:58 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22824
I thought the userscript was broken?
Replies (0): none
#8054 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 00:28:04 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22823
>Do not use Decentraleyes, it is outdated
Replies (0): none
#8055 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 01:10:11 — REPORT — QUOTE
only using these
youtube is fucking cancer
>>22822
kinda bloat
>>22827
>>22828
very good
Replies (0): none
#8056 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 01:23:59 — REPORT — QUOTE
Ublock origin
Violentmonkey
Highly recommend to port over every single extension to a userscript wherever possible. Use AI if you need to
Replies (0): none
#8057 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 01:41:52 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22823
Fpbp but nobody will listen to this
Replies (0): none
#8058 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 04:18:53 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
Replies (0): none
#8059 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 05:39:11 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
Replies (0): none
#8060 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 07:53:35 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
FoxyProxy and Redirector are pretty much essential for me now. The former to automatically have certain websites use proxies to avoid age verification bullshit, and Redirector to unfuck Imgur links/embeds (also use it to redirect Reddit to Redlib instead).
Replies (0): none
#8061 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 07:57:00 — REPORT — QUOTE
ITT: retards who bought snake oil
ubo and an open source password manager is all you need
Replies (0): none
#8062 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 08:11:10 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
that extension list is ragebait so much useless shit
Replies (0): none
#8063 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 08:29:26 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
>Ublock origin
>Violentmonkey
>PassFF
Everything else is useless.
Replies (0): none
#8064 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 08:38:33 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
>What do you use or recommend?
ublock origin and going outside
Replies (0): none
#8065 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 08:45:25 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22839
>ublock origin
>not adguard
bad b8
Replies (0): none
#8066 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 09:34:28 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22836
Dark Reader sucks massive fucking ass
Replies (0): none
#8067 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 09:44:51 — REPORT — QUOTE
It's a shame that so few of the actually useful youtube addons ship a userscript version. I use the userscript version of Return Dislikes, for example.
Replies (0): none
#8068 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 10:54:43 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22841
uBO...
>"Hard Mode" blocks all 3rd-party scripts and frames by default per site, AdGuard lacks this default-deny toggle
>natively blocks WebRTC IP leaks directly in the free browser extension
>natively disables hyperlink auditing (ping) and link pre-fetching via popup settings
>can block network requests based on specific HTTP headers using advanced modifiers
>uses significantly less CPU and RAM due to a highly optimized engine
>is 100% FOSS (GPLv3) with no paid tiers or feature lockouts
>makes zero background network requests or telemetry
>scriptlet library is updated faster by the community to bypass aggressive anti-adblock walls
AdGuard
>locks system-wide blocking, DNS filtering, and advanced stealth mode behind a paid desktop app
>is commercial software primarily designed to upsell you to their premium apps
>free tier products are useless memes
Replies (0): none
#8069 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 13:11:13 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22830
nta but bumping up a version number is not an update, it's fundamentally outdated as a function of the addon and I used to swear by decentraleyes as a must have
there is an addon that replaced it, localcdn or some shit like that I forgot the name
but regardless, worthless with ublock origin, same way privacy badger is worthless with ublock origin
Replies (0): none
#8070 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 13:13:47 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
works for me
Replies (0): none
#8071 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 13:16:40 — REPORT — QUOTE
It's crazy how many uneducated people run addons that conflict with uBO and then end up having worse content blocking within their browser.
>>22846
>disable webrtc
Literally go into about:config and set media.peerconnection.enabled to false.
Replies (0): none
#8072 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 13:21:28 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22847
>Literally go into about:config and set media.peerconnection.enabled to false.
oh, thanks
Replies (0): none
#8073 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 14:10:40 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22832
why?
Replies (0): none
#8074 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 18:45:31 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22842
Yeah, I have it disabled for most sites I use which already have a built-in dark mode. I'd use something else but Dark Reader's dynamic filter looks better than any alternatives I've tried.
Replies (0): none
#8075 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 19:03:09 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22844
retard
Replies (0): none
#8076 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 19:34:43 — REPORT — QUOTE
Is there anything that makes it so that the browser always opens a .png version of an image if the original is .webp?
I fucking hate .webp.
Replies (0): none
#8077 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 20:00:26 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22852
Not for chromium afaik
Replies (0): none
#8078 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 20:19:14 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22852
Only on Firefox and forks: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/dont-accept-webp/
Replies (0): none
#8079 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 20:26:22 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22844
The AdGuard extension is completely separate from the AdGuard desktop application. The extension is FOSS, and not crippled in any way. uBO borrows a lot of conventions from AdGuard (the extension). They are both very effective and efficient. There is nothing wrong with using either.
>>22841
See above.
Replies (0): none
#8080 Anonymous — 2026-07-11 22:07:11 — REPORT — QUOTE
is blocktube still abandonware?
Replies (0): none
#8081 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 02:48:48 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
>>22823
What about addons like CanvasBlocker and LocalCDN?
Can uBo do those things as well?
Replies (0): none
#8082 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 05:37:01 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22829
It is, anon is messing with you
Replies (0): none
#8083 SmoothPorcupine — 2026-07-12 13:15:49 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
>recommend
A system where websites voluntarily load (via localStorage thin) a standard script path from a localhost directory holding extensions which might not even /need/ to detect which sites are loading them dependent on host site support for modular extensibility.
(ask AI what it means, further cite idempotent GET when the "modern" security lie makes it hesitate to yield control)
Replies (0): none
#8084 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 13:28:52 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22834
>fsb botnet
Replies (0): none
#8085 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 14:38:51 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
Like half of that shit can be replaced with ublock origin filters.
Replies (0): none
#8086 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 15:27:24 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22823
>Do not use Privacy Badger with uBO - Dashboard > Filter Lists > Enable Privacy Badger equivalent filters, those 2 addons fight eachother and work worse than having just one;
Can you explain which options need to be toggled?
Replies (0): none
#8087 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 16:11:01 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22822
Get rid of everything except ublock origin, holy shit. I'd even recommend downgrading to ublock lite and see if you actually needed origin's full functionality. Fuck extensions.
Replies (0): none
#8088 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 17:38:01 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22856
It's not strictly speaking Abandonware, it just gets updated very rarely. I can't really blame the dev, YouTube's UI retards won't stop changing things for the worst and breaking the extension. Currently, it works fine if you're not logged in, but if you are, the recommendations sidebar is completely fucked and not even the regular, official, "not interested" / "don't recommend this channel" buttons work. And it's been that way for months.
Replies (0): none
#8089 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 17:40:29 — REPORT — QUOTE
>tree style tab
Firefox has it natively
fucking retards
Replies (0): none
#8090 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 17:44:56 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22864
>not even the regular, official, "not interested" / "don't recommend this channel" buttons work.
And before someone tries to post a screenshot proving otherwise, they don't actually do anything other than to say "got it we won't recommend blah blah" and then not working no matter how many times you use them.
Replies (0): none
#8091 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 17:54:44 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22850
You're not wrong, but when that dynamic filtering shits the bed, it does so hard. I've had pages freeze up time and time again, while static filtering always worked fine (and also looked awful).
Replies (0): none
#8092 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 18:21:51 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22849
One less potential attack vector, it's uncommon but extensions have been hijacked in the past to turn malicious and steal your cookies and info
Replies (0): none
#8093 Anonymous — 2026-07-12 20:21:26 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22868
I wonder how well a Password Manager would work in mitigating stuff like that. I was thinking of separating my browsing habits (and their related extensions) into several browsers to reduce the potential damage as much as possible. I already do anything banking related on a dedicated browser, I'd just be extending that logic further a bit. YouTube loads faster on Chromium anyway, and many if not most of my extensions and scripts are there to make it usable.
Replies (0): none
#8094 Anonymous — 2026-07-13 02:36:09 — REPORT — QUOTE
Same on desktop, sans video background fix obviously. Everyone here seems to be saying ubo handles what localcdn and clearurls does?
Replies (0): none
#8095 Anonymous — 2026-07-13 09:06:40 — REPORT — QUOTE
>>22870
>css exfil protection
That's a thing?
Replies (0): none