Anonymous · original post · 2026-07-12 00:40:56
.264 IWS LICC all the things
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 00:42:19
>>20788
>and the combination was mentioned in the patent
Can you link the patent, the only one I can find is the one for their EPR.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 00:42:36
>>20739
At what a whole ten yards of distance and 3500fps handloads?
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 00:44:31
>>20801
Threads don't just disappear when they hit the bump limit.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 00:46:34
>>20812
Should be one of these. On further review it might be steel up front, tungsten core rear. There's some reading between the lines too. They don't say tungsten outright but that's the only way the projectile works lengthwise.
>https://patents.google.com/patent/US20240102779A1
>https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2025165349A1/en
>https://patents.justia.com/patent/20260133018
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 00:48:31
>>20814
>derp
Obviously,
DUMB
FUCK.
but they no longer get put up to the top of the Catalog and *at limit* are slowly sliding off of the Catalog to their permanent Death.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 00:48:35
>>20771
Anon got sidegraded.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 00:52:54
>>20808
1. ESAPI right now is 3x M2AP up to 2,880ft/s or 3x 5.56 M995 up to 3,400.
2. XSAPI is 3x M993 up to 3,100 or 3x 5.56 M995 up to 3,400.
Both have a minimum first shot M2AP v50 of 3,150ft/s.
>Also I don't know why this is even unheard of when there's youtubers who shoot Barret .50cal against temu plates.
We're talking legit AP here, not ball.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 00:55:00
>>20816
Mr. Cohen is such a jackfuck he'll probably ghostpost on desuarchive for the next three years.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 00:59:32
>>20817
>>20818
cuh got sidegraded
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:13:25
>>20806
>My annoyance with the M7 NGSW program is the lack of GPMG/SAW.
You mean the M250.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:13:52
>>20774
A somewhat better trajectory and velocity compared to 7.62 Nato is why we're supposed to be going back to battle rifles? Am I supposed to be impressed by this?
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:14:36
>>20822
>pic of hammered dogshit
checked
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:17:29
>>20823
He will continue to avoid this because he knows 6.8 SIDEGRADES 5.56 and is a DOWNGRADE for infantry purposes.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:23:58
Listen up people. China has a lot more tungsten than the US does and can PENETRATE US.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:25:29
>>20823
>slightly
It is why the US military should replace its 7.62x51 rifles and MG with 6.8 ones, sidegrade anon couldn't make a counter argument more substantive than institutional inertia and so has tried to shift the discussion.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:26:42
>>20823
read through the thread, anon has been nothing but obsessed about proving that 6.8 is better than 7.62 even though no one is arguing otherwise and aren't praising 7.62 as if it should be thec standard issue round. dude's brain is fried and he's completely missed the point; switching to a full powered round is retarded but if you have to do that and there's already a perfectly suitable one available...but you shouldn't do that because that's retarded too.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:29:40
>>20827
>It is why the US military should replace its 7.62x51 rifles and MG with 6.8 ones
Damn son, that sure would be nice if that was all they were doing but they aren't sooooo what are you even arguing? We're making a slightly less dumbfuck decision to adopt battle rifles over assault rifles because 6.8 bests 7.62? Cool, I feel so much better now.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:32:34
>>20829
So you don't actually disagree but the 5.56 issue means you have to object to 6.8 then?
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:33:48
>>20828
>even though no one is arguing otherwise
Gaslight time already sidegrade anon?
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:34:28
>>20830
What the fuck? I don't give a shit about 7.62 v 6.8, neither should be the round for the standard issue infantry rifle. Yes I object to 6.8 in that context, I thought I made that perfectly clear.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:35:57
>>20831
you have been arguing in bad faith throughout this thread and clearly don't do any real shooting, certainly not with bigboi bullets. go away now.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 01:44:36
>>20827
There is something so fucking depressing about someone simping for a bullet this hard and knowing he'll never even shoot it
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 02:11:59
Avengers and white boys are on us this morning.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 02:32:59
>>20834
Whoever complains about armor autism in /gq/ after this has no idea.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 03:04:48
>>20833
All I have been arguing is how the US military should replace its 7.62x51 firearms with 6.8 firearms, you are emotionally invested in 7.62x51 but can't argue in its favor so you resorted to attacking me instead.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 03:05:32
>>20511
have you ever been shot in the plates?
of course not.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 03:13:10
>>20837
>waaagh they're attacking me!!!!!
>this anon earlier today:
>>20713
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 03:16:23
>>20837
Please counter the posts in >>20748.
You have failed to do so.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 03:20:09
This thread unironically ruined the NGSW's reputation. This was the best Mr. Cohen's shills could do?
Like I said that fucker looks fake as hell. Unironically wouldn't be surprised if he was a martian sent to fuck us over
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 04:19:25
>>20840
>counter these things which have nothing to do with replacing 7,62x51 firearms with 6.8 firearms
also see >>20752
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-12 13:58:15
>>20842
All dodges. Pathetic.
>>20834
He certainly didn't dispute the claim he was an unemployed motherfucker.
We collectively need to start billing for our time honestly and start sending SIG invoices for wasting it. Then take them to collections. Then our homeless SIG shill may actually be able to hold a 6.8 bullet.
Report · Quote
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-13 02:09:00
>>20582
I when that started. In '97 we never shot at anything but paper targets. We did stab rubber dummies with bayonets though, and learned how to cave in someone's face with our boot heels.
Report · Quote
Ghost of Zaitsev · reply · 2026-07-14 17:01:10
Ща вернусь. Пойду достану свои «Мосинки», патроны 7,62×54R (вроде валялись где-то во дворе) и найду брусок, чтобы проверить работу затвора. А там посмотрим.
Report · Quote