>megabytes of anime gif vomit and random prefab javascript widgets that'd bring a pc from the actual geocities era to its knees
>every site made by a monoculture of 14sheitthetadeltas with dni lists longer than the encyclopedia britannica and the same four or so media interests (vocaloid, deltarune, nintendo 3ds games, maybe serial experiments lain if you're lucky)
>all authenticity filtered through ironically larping some contrived y2k frutiger aero aesthetic that didn't even exist in any appreciable form in the 2000s-early 2010s
>little to no organizational hierarchy, massive walls of text everywhere about the creator's hyperfixations if the site isn't just a glorified linktree
>having to scroll through trigger warnings to get to the index page because the creator used the naughty fuck word somewhere in a blog post
>nobody hosting services like xmpp (everyone just uses discord instead because of course they do) or ftp, not even so much as a minecraft server
>people treating neocities/nekoweb more like myspace 2 than a proper web host, placing undue emphasis on comments and follows
>outright refusing to implement responsive css because mobile is le bad and le corporate
>poor accessibility, with most sites lacking image alt text and having garish colors and animations that could harm people with epilepsy or other neurological/sensory issues
>rss feeds are utterly nonexistent

where did the personal web revival go wrong? Are the societal conditions that produced the internet of the 90s just not there anymore?

There are good ones, and not finding them is a skill issue.

>>3904
absolute coal. not to mention projecting the worst of the progressive ideologies: see the "i use she/her pronouns" and that grim furry or whatever it is.

>every site made by a monoculture of 14sheitthetadeltas
where do you think you are?

I am thinking of creating a webpage for myself and I will take your complaints as feedback for my non-existent site, thx!

>>3926
sexo post here when ur done

>>3927
I got you fam, will post it o7

>>3904
is this not just another branch of the fucking zoomer digital cargo cult thread that has a hundred fucking replies

>>3957
branches good

>>3979
ok

>>3904
>outright refusing to implement responsive css because mobile is le bad and le corporate
Nothing wrong with that. Only third world shitters use or care about smartphones. I actually block mobile users on my personal site.

>>10824
i'd argue in favor for mobile friendliness from the perspective of a moderator of a site that revolves around this kind of design
if i'm taking a shit or i'm out and about and my phone starts getting bombed because some guy is posting child porn i'd like the experience from me opening my phone to going to the ban button to be a relatively easy task that doesn't take more than 15 seconds to do
if you aren't running a dynamic site though then yeah fuck phoneposters. they need to learn how to flip their shit horizontally if they want to navigate a static website so bad. they shouldn't even need to either since html autoscales these days

Desktop first mobile second all the way no matter what though

>>10824
To add onto that,
>>3904
>anime gif
Nothing wrong.
>media interests (vocaloid [...] nintendo 3ds games [...])
Nothing wrong.
>massive walls of text everywhere about the creator's hyperfixations
Based.
>nobody hosting services like xmpp [...] or ftp, not even so much as a minecraft server
Who said everyone must host services?
>poor accessibility, with most sites lacking image alt text and having garish colors and animations that could harm people with epilepsy or other neurological/sensory issues
Not my problem, cripple.

>no RSS feeds
>javascript/gif overuse
>XMPP left to rot
Only valid complaints, everything else is whining over *personal* websites/interests. If you don't like it fuck off.

There is nothing wrong with adding smartphone access. Face it , not all of us at all times are carrying around our corebooted thinkpad 200x's looking for a ethernet port. I believe it comes from a place of high horse mentality as well as immaturity if you're >>10824 , Sure understand that smartphones have become somewhat of a cancer in the tech industry as well as websites catering torwards them. Don't act like you haven't used your smartphone when you're out and about for various purposes, also face the fact that they're portable computers within themselves, and if you're using GrapheneOS and decent opsec they're not bad.

>>12250
>Don't act like you haven't used your smartphone when you're out and about for various purposes
Don't have to act, I don't have a smartphone.
Why add smartphone access? People aren't going to be surfing to my site through a phone anyway.