>>20893
>wisconsin is actually an engineering hyperpower because they used a lake to move troops on the occasion
too angry to die, bugman?
>Most powerful empire of its time >does nothing Why are chinese like this? Thei…
LOUNGE · Back to threads · Report thread
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 16:53:06
>>20891
>china isn't even a true brown water power by that metric
Historically it was very much brown water only for millennia, yes
>ship 100 ton obelisks across it
Piss easy when the fucking sea has virtually no tide and sea states rarely breach 3, idiot
>it's no coincidence that chinks had dynastic shift-tier upheavals whenever the flow of European silver stopped
Correlation isn't causation, and you are mistaking currency for wealth
If a nation's trade settlement in USD suddenly drops, is the base underlying reason due to a lack of USD money supply, or because they are experiencing an economic crisis and are therefore slashing imports and hence reducing settlements in USD?
inb4 Russia's trade settlements in USD fell by half, causing them to go to war against Ukraine
Which is the cart and which is the horse?
>>20892
>They fell behind only during the Qing dynasty, when novel developments widened the gap between what was necessary and what commonplace to a hopeless degree
This is a statement of events rather than an explanation of why it happened and what factors might've caused it
>the Japanese had a silver surplus, much of that trade made them net importers. China was used as a deflationary trade partner. You got large quantities of whatever they had, gave them your silver, then resold them in Europe for a net profit
Again, the underlying trade probably had a far greater impact than the medium used for it
The economy is always always ALWAYS built on products and services, the currency is a blind
>china isn't even a true brown water power by that metric
Historically it was very much brown water only for millennia, yes
>ship 100 ton obelisks across it
Piss easy when the fucking sea has virtually no tide and sea states rarely breach 3, idiot
>it's no coincidence that chinks had dynastic shift-tier upheavals whenever the flow of European silver stopped
Correlation isn't causation, and you are mistaking currency for wealth
If a nation's trade settlement in USD suddenly drops, is the base underlying reason due to a lack of USD money supply, or because they are experiencing an economic crisis and are therefore slashing imports and hence reducing settlements in USD?
inb4 Russia's trade settlements in USD fell by half, causing them to go to war against Ukraine
Which is the cart and which is the horse?
>>20892
>They fell behind only during the Qing dynasty, when novel developments widened the gap between what was necessary and what commonplace to a hopeless degree
This is a statement of events rather than an explanation of why it happened and what factors might've caused it
>the Japanese had a silver surplus, much of that trade made them net importers. China was used as a deflationary trade partner. You got large quantities of whatever they had, gave them your silver, then resold them in Europe for a net profit
Again, the underlying trade probably had a far greater impact than the medium used for it
The economy is always always ALWAYS built on products and services, the currency is a blind
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 16:57:15
>>20896
>Piss easy when the fucking sea has virtually no tide
so easy that millenia passed without such feats
>Correlation isn't causation
lol
>and you are mistaking currency for wealth
you're mistaking wealth for developed trade, which cannot exist without a stable trade medium.
>Piss easy when the fucking sea has virtually no tide
so easy that millenia passed without such feats
>Correlation isn't causation
lol
>and you are mistaking currency for wealth
you're mistaking wealth for developed trade, which cannot exist without a stable trade medium.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 17:12:05
>>20897
>millenia passed without such feats
Compared to navigating the Atlantic, the Skeleton coast, the Cape of Good Hope and Cape Horn? Yes
Rome to Carthage is what 300 miles and Sicily to Carthage is 100 miles, even retards could make a quick run to Sicily and then hug the coast the rest of the way
>which cannot exist without a stable trade medium
he said, describing a trade relation that enriched its main factors due to massive arbitrage
>millenia passed without such feats
Compared to navigating the Atlantic, the Skeleton coast, the Cape of Good Hope and Cape Horn? Yes
Rome to Carthage is what 300 miles and Sicily to Carthage is 100 miles, even retards could make a quick run to Sicily and then hug the coast the rest of the way
>which cannot exist without a stable trade medium
he said, describing a trade relation that enriched its main factors due to massive arbitrage
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 18:05:54
>>20896
>This is a statement of events rather than an explanation of why it happened and what factors might've caused it
If you mean the question of why China didn't end up like Meiji-era Japan, it's because the British weren't Whigs. Nationalist China technologically developed beyond Qing, but since we were talking about China's progress in relation to Japan's, there's not much to say. Its progress in the face of the West is different.
>Again, the underlying trade probably had a far greater impact than the medium used for it
You blind fuck. I just told you how the medium affected the trade. The roles of buyer and seller determine which goods go where and how that affects modernization, but since they both adopted the weaponry anyway, the narrative is moot.
>This is a statement of events rather than an explanation of why it happened and what factors might've caused it
If you mean the question of why China didn't end up like Meiji-era Japan, it's because the British weren't Whigs. Nationalist China technologically developed beyond Qing, but since we were talking about China's progress in relation to Japan's, there's not much to say. Its progress in the face of the West is different.
>Again, the underlying trade probably had a far greater impact than the medium used for it
You blind fuck. I just told you how the medium affected the trade. The roles of buyer and seller determine which goods go where and how that affects modernization, but since they both adopted the weaponry anyway, the narrative is moot.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 21:31:36
>>20845
>North
Arctic
>West
Literal thousands of miles of steppe, desert and mountains between the center of power and whatever is on the other side; have fun holding it
>South
The trees are speaking Vietnamese
>East
Conventional armies don't do great in boats.
>North
Arctic
>West
Literal thousands of miles of steppe, desert and mountains between the center of power and whatever is on the other side; have fun holding it
>South
The trees are speaking Vietnamese
>East
Conventional armies don't do great in boats.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 22:21:10
>>20866
>>20873
The Great Wall I'm guessing.
>>20873
The Great Wall I'm guessing.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 22:22:31
>>20861
A large chinese warband would just conquer itself retard.
A large chinese warband would just conquer itself retard.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 22:31:17
>>20845
Who owned the part between North and South Korea
Who owned the part between North and South Korea
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 22:54:56
>>20903
A Korean kingdom that went by the name Silla. Koreans had their own three-kingdom period that ended with Silla allying with Tang, those two conquering the two other major Korean kingdoms.
A Korean kingdom that went by the name Silla. Koreans had their own three-kingdom period that ended with Silla allying with Tang, those two conquering the two other major Korean kingdoms.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-07 23:01:08
>>20845
>>Most powerful empire of its time
>>does nothing
>Why are chinese like this?
The mongols could administrate a large area because they were nomads and had long distance couriers and could actually travel to the far reaches.
Most of China's empires were spending all of their effort to maintain the empire at its current size (and expand to the other chinese provinces they didn't control.)
>>Most powerful empire of its time
>>does nothing
>Why are chinese like this?
The mongols could administrate a large area because they were nomads and had long distance couriers and could actually travel to the far reaches.
Most of China's empires were spending all of their effort to maintain the empire at its current size (and expand to the other chinese provinces they didn't control.)
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 01:03:52
>>20896
The Ming chimped out over Japanese and Korean pirates, so they banned all trade whatsoever. Then they also closed domestic mining. Then the Ming dynasty didn't change it's tax policy from fees in silver as silver inflated in price leading exponential taxation DURRING A FUCKING FAMINE. This was 100% currency related.
The Ming chimped out over Japanese and Korean pirates, so they banned all trade whatsoever. Then they also closed domestic mining. Then the Ming dynasty didn't change it's tax policy from fees in silver as silver inflated in price leading exponential taxation DURRING A FUCKING FAMINE. This was 100% currency related.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 01:09:16
>>20845
It's pretty easy to control the steppe, it's changed hands over history more times then OP's mum
It's pretty easy to control the steppe, it's changed hands over history more times then OP's mum
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 01:58:25
>>20906
>the economic crisis was caused by capital controls during a famine, not by the famine itself
>the economic crisis was caused by capital controls during a famine, not by the famine itself
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 02:09:25
>>20908
I'm arguing that the damage would have been less severe if the Ming hadn't had a policy of expecting a third or more of a peasants' income durring a famine, yeah.
I'm arguing that the damage would have been less severe if the Ming hadn't had a policy of expecting a third or more of a peasants' income durring a famine, yeah.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 02:32:21
>>20909
and I'm arguing that bad monetary policy might make disasters worse, but pales in damage wrought to the disaster itself
and I'm arguing that bad monetary policy might make disasters worse, but pales in damage wrought to the disaster itself
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 02:51:31
>>20858
>That explains why it would fail but not why they wouldn't try
Because they're China.
The Romans figured this out when they reached Scotland, difference was their economic system was largely built on:
>kill those guys
>take their shit
So course correcting when that's like a third of what you're good at, is hard. The Chinese though were at that stage pretty much since the Han when they went up north and found a huge expanse of grass filled horse fucking inbred yokels and 0 gold or silver except what they brought. And went down South and found a bunch of jungle humping savages that didn't have the decency to have big tits. And out west they found mountains and when those weren't there is was desert, and not enough gold and silver between either to fill a childs cart.
And that's really what it's about you know? Gold and silver. The few times the dirty savages around China, like the Zhenla, Gojoseon, or Wa managed to stop picking through their shit long enough to copy them they were just civilized enough to have the manners to send China gold and silver, as they should, because China is so great.
>That explains why it would fail but not why they wouldn't try
Because they're China.
The Romans figured this out when they reached Scotland, difference was their economic system was largely built on:
>kill those guys
>take their shit
So course correcting when that's like a third of what you're good at, is hard. The Chinese though were at that stage pretty much since the Han when they went up north and found a huge expanse of grass filled horse fucking inbred yokels and 0 gold or silver except what they brought. And went down South and found a bunch of jungle humping savages that didn't have the decency to have big tits. And out west they found mountains and when those weren't there is was desert, and not enough gold and silver between either to fill a childs cart.
And that's really what it's about you know? Gold and silver. The few times the dirty savages around China, like the Zhenla, Gojoseon, or Wa managed to stop picking through their shit long enough to copy them they were just civilized enough to have the manners to send China gold and silver, as they should, because China is so great.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 03:58:17
>>20911
>And went down South and found a bunch of jungle humping savages that didn't have the decency to have big tits
shows what you know
the Southern Province to this day is famed for having girls with big tits
and anywhere you see a Viet with pale(r) face and small(er) tits, you know it's because her great-great-nth-great-grandparents were chink rapebabies
>And went down South and found a bunch of jungle humping savages that didn't have the decency to have big tits
shows what you know
the Southern Province to this day is famed for having girls with big tits
and anywhere you see a Viet with pale(r) face and small(er) tits, you know it's because her great-great-nth-great-grandparents were chink rapebabies
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 04:47:05
>>20857
The Mongol Empire's popular depiction is also very different than its reality. It wasn't barbarians on horseback, it had an established bureaucracy and administrative divisions, and largely left existing local governments in place that were able to function with a relatively great deal of autonomy under a tributary system.
The Mongol Empire's popular depiction is also very different than its reality. It wasn't barbarians on horseback, it had an established bureaucracy and administrative divisions, and largely left existing local governments in place that were able to function with a relatively great deal of autonomy under a tributary system.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 05:38:04
>>20913
And a pretty decent logistics pipeline
Then again they stole most of the admin tech off us chinks, i am ethnically obligated to say
And a pretty decent logistics pipeline
Then again they stole most of the admin tech off us chinks, i am ethnically obligated to say
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 05:39:10
>>20912
Vietnamese don't have big tits
Vietnamese don't have big tits
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 06:46:32
>>20882
>Ruled by outsiders
>"What up fellow Han, sure was great to be our own country greater than all the other cuck nations huh?"
Biggest lie in existence, let your ABCs avoid being giga-cucks who pretend that nearly the last millennia wasn't rule by foreign invaders who shit down the throats of their people and also stagnating the nation of progress that the Japanese were able to make.
>Ruled by outsiders
>"What up fellow Han, sure was great to be our own country greater than all the other cuck nations huh?"
Biggest lie in existence, let your ABCs avoid being giga-cucks who pretend that nearly the last millennia wasn't rule by foreign invaders who shit down the throats of their people and also stagnating the nation of progress that the Japanese were able to make.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 06:49:48
>>20879
>Han
dude, l'mao zedong
Pan-Hanism isn't real. This is like saying
>Yeah so you were made into rapebabies by the Soviets who forced you into their faggy ass alliance but you're no longer a filthy tribal.
>#We are all ̶S̶o̶v̶i̶e̶t̶
>We are all European
>There are no Germans
>There are no Ukrainians
>There are no British
>There are no French
>We are part of the European Empire, ruled by the capital in Muscuvy
>Han
dude, l'mao zedong
Pan-Hanism isn't real. This is like saying
>Yeah so you were made into rapebabies by the Soviets who forced you into their faggy ass alliance but you're no longer a filthy tribal.
>#We are all ̶S̶o̶v̶i̶e̶t̶
>We are all European
>There are no Germans
>There are no Ukrainians
>There are no British
>There are no French
>We are part of the European Empire, ruled by the capital in Muscuvy
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 06:58:44
>>20881
>slave race
You're describing near-modern Chinese history. Mongol -> Manchu rule was shit. Mongol rule is like phase 1 of being wifebeaten, Manchu rule was when the wifebeater gets old, senile and blows every fork in road decision.
Skip all the Chinese Legalist shit of shitting down the population's throat as a base, that's easy enough to look at how historical governance sucked like a lot of historical governments. Mongol and Manchu rule cemented the suck and retardation forever like Russian rule of lands. There is a distinct export of shitty policies and shitty culture forever.
The CCP is practically a continuation of shitass rule "but with socialist characteristics." A hybrid of dogshit shoved down the throats of a beaten, soul crushed populace.
Look at how Chinese diaspora look elsewhere once they slip the yoke of retarded rulers. Same story when you look at "Russians" who slip out of Russia (Sikorsky, Seversky, Kartveli for easy examples). China's "Father of Nukes and Rockets" only exists due to American education and the unfortunate aspect of being loyal to China as a nation (Imperial -> Republic -> People's Republic). Were he have not to gone back the Chinese rocket program would have taken decades longer.
>slave race
You're describing near-modern Chinese history. Mongol -> Manchu rule was shit. Mongol rule is like phase 1 of being wifebeaten, Manchu rule was when the wifebeater gets old, senile and blows every fork in road decision.
Skip all the Chinese Legalist shit of shitting down the population's throat as a base, that's easy enough to look at how historical governance sucked like a lot of historical governments. Mongol and Manchu rule cemented the suck and retardation forever like Russian rule of lands. There is a distinct export of shitty policies and shitty culture forever.
The CCP is practically a continuation of shitass rule "but with socialist characteristics." A hybrid of dogshit shoved down the throats of a beaten, soul crushed populace.
Look at how Chinese diaspora look elsewhere once they slip the yoke of retarded rulers. Same story when you look at "Russians" who slip out of Russia (Sikorsky, Seversky, Kartveli for easy examples). China's "Father of Nukes and Rockets" only exists due to American education and the unfortunate aspect of being loyal to China as a nation (Imperial -> Republic -> People's Republic). Were he have not to gone back the Chinese rocket program would have taken decades longer.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 09:51:56
>>20915
For chinks, they do
And they get bigger the less chink blood and more Austronesian blood they have
>>20916
I don't understand this post
>>20917
Precisely
For chinks, they do
And they get bigger the less chink blood and more Austronesian blood they have
>>20916
I don't understand this post
>>20917
Precisely
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 11:07:41
>>20919
Chinese ultranationalists like to eat oxcarts full of human shit destined for the ricefields in believing that rule under the Mongol and Manchu dynasties was anything but subjugation by foreigners. Teaching your lil ones that they have no obligation to have "pride" in being serfs is a good thing.
Chinese ultranationalists like to eat oxcarts full of human shit destined for the ricefields in believing that rule under the Mongol and Manchu dynasties was anything but subjugation by foreigners. Teaching your lil ones that they have no obligation to have "pride" in being serfs is a good thing.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 11:08:37
>>20845
Pic unrelated?
Pic unrelated?
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 14:32:50
>>20920
I hear otherwise from Han nationalists, they all curse the rule of the Mongol Yuan and Manchu Qing, bragging about how Mongols were subjected to massacres during the red turban rebellion and the Manchu being culturally genocided during the 1911 revolution. They end up praising the Tang Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty more than anything imo
I hear otherwise from Han nationalists, they all curse the rule of the Mongol Yuan and Manchu Qing, bragging about how Mongols were subjected to massacres during the red turban rebellion and the Manchu being culturally genocided during the 1911 revolution. They end up praising the Tang Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty more than anything imo
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 14:51:28
>>20922
Yeah duh
That's like Anglo-Saxons bitching about the fucking French ruining everything from William the Conker onwards, while simultaneously cheering Henry V (of Norman descent) for sticking it to the fucking French
Yeah duh
That's like Anglo-Saxons bitching about the fucking French ruining everything from William the Conker onwards, while simultaneously cheering Henry V (of Norman descent) for sticking it to the fucking French
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 19:45:58
>>20849
China was never going to get past the Iranian Plateau, let alone reach the Fertile Crescent.
China was never going to get past the Iranian Plateau, let alone reach the Fertile Crescent.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-08 22:39:39
>>20914
>+25 social credit score for saying someone else copied superior Chinese system
>-55 social credit score for using the word "most"
You will be arrested, beaten, and forced to publicly humiliate yourself for insulting Chinese sensibilities but you'll still be able to ride public transit. Just the shitty kinds though.
>+25 social credit score for saying someone else copied superior Chinese system
>-55 social credit score for using the word "most"
You will be arrested, beaten, and forced to publicly humiliate yourself for insulting Chinese sensibilities but you'll still be able to ride public transit. Just the shitty kinds though.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 01:04:25
>>20925
fortunately great granddad left China so I can tell you gweilo all the shit the other chinks won't tell you
(unfortunately he was high as a kite most of his life, but that's another story)
fortunately great granddad left China so I can tell you gweilo all the shit the other chinks won't tell you
(unfortunately he was high as a kite most of his life, but that's another story)
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 11:36:23
>>20868
Why the fuck would a taoist meme would use the birth of Christ as year 0?
Why the fuck would a taoist meme would use the birth of Christ as year 0?
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 13:16:00
>>20927
NTA but the whole reason BC is fucking stupid is we don't know the exact year Jesus was born. It was somewhere between like 10bc and 4bc, so Jesus was born 10 years before christ, which is fucking dumb.
NTA but the whole reason BC is fucking stupid is we don't know the exact year Jesus was born. It was somewhere between like 10bc and 4bc, so Jesus was born 10 years before christ, which is fucking dumb.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 13:39:56
>>20871
Trashcan Man did literally nothing wrong, okay? Okay.
Trashcan Man did literally nothing wrong, okay? Okay.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 13:56:47
>>20928
Doesn't matter, we all know CEniggers are trying to deChristianise society, so fuck em regardless
If clock hands and foot measures were a Crucifixion reference I would bin every digital clock I have and ban the metric system
Doesn't matter, we all know CEniggers are trying to deChristianise society, so fuck em regardless
If clock hands and foot measures were a Crucifixion reference I would bin every digital clock I have and ban the metric system
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 14:03:30
>>20930
>Doesn't matter, we all know CEniggers are trying to deChristianise society, so fuck em regardless
It's not called dechristianising if it was never christian and in any case, theocracies are trash.
The more influence religion has, the worse society gets.
Your kind need education.
>Doesn't matter, we all know CEniggers are trying to deChristianise society, so fuck em regardless
It's not called dechristianising if it was never christian and in any case, theocracies are trash.
The more influence religion has, the worse society gets.
Your kind need education.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 15:40:27
>>20931
White civilisation up to the turn of the millennium was built by Christians, and they infused the epistemology of every field they worked in with the tenets of Christianity, especially in the humanities such as law and sociology. If you disagree then you are probably heathen and brown.
White civilisation up to the turn of the millennium was built by Christians, and they infused the epistemology of every field they worked in with the tenets of Christianity, especially in the humanities such as law and sociology. If you disagree then you are probably heathen and brown.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 15:52:12
>>20845
why not go south from kabul and conquer india? all that flat space just waiting
why not go south from kabul and conquer india? all that flat space just waiting
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 16:07:39
>>20932
>White civilisation up to the turn of the millennium was built by Christians, and they infused the epistemology of every field they worked in with the tenets of Christianity, especially in the humanities such as law and sociology
Other way around, European humanism tamed Christianity from being a mystery cult into a tool.
Christian was as primitive as every other religion until we fucked with it and trimmed its rough corners off.
It was still pretty brutal even a century or two ago and still has a bunch of fucked up shit in it.
And the proof of this is that wherever it gets a little power, things turn to shit at a rapid pace.
You just can't build civilisation on religion, though you can civilise religions to a degree.
>White civilisation up to the turn of the millennium was built by Christians, and they infused the epistemology of every field they worked in with the tenets of Christianity, especially in the humanities such as law and sociology
Other way around, European humanism tamed Christianity from being a mystery cult into a tool.
Christian was as primitive as every other religion until we fucked with it and trimmed its rough corners off.
It was still pretty brutal even a century or two ago and still has a bunch of fucked up shit in it.
And the proof of this is that wherever it gets a little power, things turn to shit at a rapid pace.
You just can't build civilisation on religion, though you can civilise religions to a degree.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 19:21:00
>>20934
>European humanism
What you know as "European humanism" is basically Christian, it's been in Europe for so long
>the proof of this is that wherever it gets a little power, things turn to shit at a rapid pace
you cannot use that as proof that the religion is flawed unless you can prove that those flaws are a permitted part of the religion
and if you were using the actions of the people as evidence fo that civilisation's principles and mores, it would be difficult to argue that European civilisations are much better, considering all the wars and so on over the centuries
>European humanism
What you know as "European humanism" is basically Christian, it's been in Europe for so long
>the proof of this is that wherever it gets a little power, things turn to shit at a rapid pace
you cannot use that as proof that the religion is flawed unless you can prove that those flaws are a permitted part of the religion
and if you were using the actions of the people as evidence fo that civilisation's principles and mores, it would be difficult to argue that European civilisations are much better, considering all the wars and so on over the centuries
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 20:03:00
>>20935
>it's been in Europe for so long
No, it is explicitly not Christian, because otherwise we'd see these ideas in the middle ages and late rome.
>it's been in Europe for so long
No, it is explicitly not Christian, because otherwise we'd see these ideas in the middle ages and late rome.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 20:22:35
>>20868
thats like calling jesus “greg” just because youre in a non christian country. Youre still refering to a christian concept youre just using some silly alternative name out of obstinance. You know where the word “kike” comes from? Jews using a circle instead of an “X” when filling out paperwork just to avoid drawing a cross. (Yiddish for circle is “kikel”.) You are engaging in literal kikery.
thats like calling jesus “greg” just because youre in a non christian country. Youre still refering to a christian concept youre just using some silly alternative name out of obstinance. You know where the word “kike” comes from? Jews using a circle instead of an “X” when filling out paperwork just to avoid drawing a cross. (Yiddish for circle is “kikel”.) You are engaging in literal kikery.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 20:41:30
>>20856
>ackshually hurr durr china bad durr
ok
>ackshually hurr durr china bad durr
ok
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 20:43:32
>>20902
you should start making sense if you want to sound smart
you should start making sense if you want to sound smart
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 20:51:16
>>20845
Wars not make one great
Wars not make one great
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 21:32:55
>>20937
>thats like calling jesus “greg”
no it isn't
more like using imperial units instead of the metric system
>thats like calling jesus “greg”
no it isn't
more like using imperial units instead of the metric system
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-09 21:40:32
>>20937
>calling jesus “greg” just because youre in a non christian country
well, you'd call him Jeshua in that case, no?
>calling jesus “greg” just because youre in a non christian country
well, you'd call him Jeshua in that case, no?
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 00:01:44
Is anybody here autistically interested in and knowledgeable about the Mongol empire?
I'm curious about their political structure and approach to expansionism, in terms of like how often they really erred on razing/sacking/massacring/enslaving military targets vs just conquering and subjugating them, and what degree the empire had actual administrative oversight and control over conquered cities or meddled in local social/cultural institutions, economic matters, or if they invested in infrastructure at all, etc
Please me as obsessively in depth with as many caveats as you are willing to type out. Even if you post 10+ posts in a row I'll read all of it.
I'm curious about their political structure and approach to expansionism, in terms of like how often they really erred on razing/sacking/massacring/enslaving military targets vs just conquering and subjugating them, and what degree the empire had actual administrative oversight and control over conquered cities or meddled in local social/cultural institutions, economic matters, or if they invested in infrastructure at all, etc
Please me as obsessively in depth with as many caveats as you are willing to type out. Even if you post 10+ posts in a row I'll read all of it.
Anonymous · reply · 2026-07-10 05:17:24
>>20938
yes.jpg
yes.jpg
‹ Newer posts Page 2 of 3 Older posts ›
Reply to this thread
Posting requires a durable account or a TripPass. Reading remains available.
Sign in or create or attach a TripPass to post. Browsing is open.