Blindly trusting an operating system just because it claims to be private is the ultimate security flaw, isn't it? 🤔

Is it theoretically possible that the GrapheneOS code was analyzed using Mythos and a large number of vulnerabilities were discovered that are not publicly known? And who might be in possession of these vulnerabilities?

whats the better alternative?

>>18925
There is no alternative. One should simply accept that there is no way out. Anything else is just self-deception.

So what should *we* use then if not graphene os? Make it make sense.

PostmarketOS works for me

Ofc I don't trust postmarketOS 100 percent either and Im not doing advertisment for them. I don't know you, maybe you k now better, there's also sailfish :)

>>18929
We should stop trusting computer technology. We should assume that everything we do on computers is being monitored. It is only going to get worse. The last refuge of privacy is the analog realm. Everything digital is compromised.

>>18929
>So what should *we* use then if not graphene os?
Real computers. There's no valid use case for smartphones unless you can't live without looking at TikTok brainrot or Instagram whores every 5 minutes.

The amount of people thinking GrapheneOS is some kind of all solving privacy solution is too damn high. If you keep using the same proprietary spyware applications and give them all the permissions they ask for, nothing will really change. It gives you all the control you need to get privacy, but it also gives you the power to give everybody the same amount of data you were giving them on stock android.

i mean the reasons would be the times they werent able to be cracked and the leaked memos from companies like cellebrite saying they cant crack it.
>>19009
i feel like i hear phones have better security than linux